A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Efficacy of modified pancreatic duct stent drainage during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Common bile duct stones pose a high risk of recurrence or disease progression if not promptly treated. However, there is still no optimal treatment approach.

Aim: To investigate the clinical efficacy of modified pancreatic duct stent drainage in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for treating common bile duct stones.

Methods: This retrospective study included 175 patients with common bile duct stones treated at Taizhou Fourth People's Hospital between January 1, 2021, and November 30, 2023. The patients were divided into three groups-the modified pancreatic duct stent drainage group (59 cases), the nasobiliary drainage group (58 cases), and the standard biliary drainage group (58 cases). Preoperative general clinical data, laboratory indicators, and the visual analog scale (VAS) at two time points (24 hours before and after surgery) were compared, along with postoperative complications across the three groups.

Results: Serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyltransferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, C-reactive protein, and amylase were significantly lower in the modified pancreatic duct stent drainage group and the standard biliary drainage group than those in the nasobiliary drainage group ( < 0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were observed in white blood cells, hemoglobin, or neutrophil levels among the three groups ( > 0.05). The standard biliary drainage group had significantly lower VAS scores [(4.36 ± 1.18) points] than those for the modified pancreatic duct stent drainage group [(4.92 ± 1.68) points] ( = 0.033), and the nasobiliary drainage group [(5.54 ± 1.24) points] ( = 0.017). There were no statistically significant differences in complication rates across the three groups ( > 0.05).

Conclusion: Compared to standard biliary drainage and nasobiliary drainage, the modified pancreatic duct stent used during ERCP for patients with bile duct stones significantly reduced hepatocyte injury, improved liver function parameters, alleviated inflammation and pain, enhanced patient comfort, and demonstrated superior safety.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12019049PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.101295DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

drainage group
36
modified pancreatic
24
pancreatic duct
24
duct stent
24
stent drainage
20
bile duct
20
common bile
16
duct stones
16
nasobiliary drainage
16
standard biliary
16

Similar Publications