Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction/aims: Neuromuscular ultrasound (NMUS), initially performed by physicians, is increasingly performed by technicians in many electrodiagnostic (EDX) laboratories for certain studies under physician supervision. The aims of this study were to determine: (1) the reproducibility of nonphysician sonographers' assessments of the median nerve and (2) the need for ongoing training to maintain the reproducibility and reliability of median nerve ultrasound assessments.
Methods: The median nerve was examined sonographically in a healthy volunteer by 12 nonphysicians on 3 separate occasions: Day 1 and then 2 weeks (Day 2) and 4 months (Day 3) later. Cross-sectional area (CSA) and wrist-to-forearm ratios (WFRs) were calculated each time. Sonographers were retrained prior to Day 2. Reproducibility and reliability were determined using coefficients of variation calculated for each characteristic for each day and each nonphysician sonographer, comparing performance across the 3 time points.
Results: There was overall less variation for each characteristic (wrist CSA, forearm CSA, and WFR) on Day 2 compared to Day 1 (coefficients of variation 3.0%, 5.4%, and 5.7% vs. 8.8%, 15.5%, and 11.3%, respectively), both when viewed at the group and individual levels, indicating an improvement in reproducibility and reliability after the retraining session. The improvement was similar for Day 3.
Discussion: This study demonstrates the need for training and subsequent retraining sessions to ensure the reproducibility and reliability of NMUS measurements in the median nerve.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.28424 | DOI Listing |