Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
The surgical management of complex congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) remains a subject of ongoing debate due to wide anatomic variability and limited comparative outcomes data. Available strategies include the anatomic repair, physiologic repair, 1.5-ventricular repair, and biventricular repair, each selected based on anatomic severity and the presence of associated lesions. This commentary reviews the existing literature to inform decision-marking between univentricular, 1.5-ventricular, and biventricular repair strategies in complex ccTGA and underscores the need for further comparative studies to guide management.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2025.03.012 | DOI Listing |