A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Solid-Supported Polymer Membranes: How Different Deposition Methods Influence Their Inner Morphology and Properties. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Solid-supported polymer membranes (SSPMs) resulting from the self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers are in focus for the development of functional surfaces with enhanced stability and more chemical versatility compared to lipid-based membranes. Different methods are used to generate such polymer planar membranes, but their internal organization and the resulting properties have not yet been compared to identify the differences and guide the selection of appropriate membranes for specific applications. Here, we present SSPMs prepared by two deposition methods─the Langmuir monolayer transfer and the solvent-assisted polymer deposition─and evaluate their internal organization and key properties. Using two different amphiphilic copolymers, a diblock and a triblock, we explored the effect of the deposition method on the resulting membranes. While the Langmuir monolayer transfer method generates condensed, homogeneous planar membranes, the ones produced by the solvent-assisted polymer deposition method have a different molecular organization. Properties, including thickness, wettability, roughness and elasticity were influenced by the membrane deposition method. Differences in inner morphology and properties of membranes generated by these two deposition methods are more pronounced for triblock-based copolymer membranes than for diblock copolymer ones. Our comparative study highlights the importance of selecting a specific preparation method to achieve SSPMs with properties tailored for desired applications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060281PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c00105DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

deposition method
12
membranes
9
solid-supported polymer
8
polymer membranes
8
deposition methods
8
inner morphology
8
morphology properties
8
planar membranes
8
internal organization
8
organization properties
8

Similar Publications