Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Solid-supported polymer membranes (SSPMs) resulting from the self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers are in focus for the development of functional surfaces with enhanced stability and more chemical versatility compared to lipid-based membranes. Different methods are used to generate such polymer planar membranes, but their internal organization and the resulting properties have not yet been compared to identify the differences and guide the selection of appropriate membranes for specific applications. Here, we present SSPMs prepared by two deposition methods─the Langmuir monolayer transfer and the solvent-assisted polymer deposition─and evaluate their internal organization and key properties. Using two different amphiphilic copolymers, a diblock and a triblock, we explored the effect of the deposition method on the resulting membranes. While the Langmuir monolayer transfer method generates condensed, homogeneous planar membranes, the ones produced by the solvent-assisted polymer deposition method have a different molecular organization. Properties, including thickness, wettability, roughness and elasticity were influenced by the membrane deposition method. Differences in inner morphology and properties of membranes generated by these two deposition methods are more pronounced for triblock-based copolymer membranes than for diblock copolymer ones. Our comparative study highlights the importance of selecting a specific preparation method to achieve SSPMs with properties tailored for desired applications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060281 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c00105 | DOI Listing |