A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

An Italian cost-utility analysis of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine for routine vaccination in infants. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Streptococcus pneumoniae represents a significant global public health threat, causing approximately 45 million lower respiratory tract infections and 350,000 deaths annually among children under 5 years of age. Conjugate pneumococcal vaccines (PCVs), such as PCV15 and PCV20, have been developed to mitigate this burden by providing protection against serotypes responsible for the disease. The present analysis aims to evaluate the cost-utility of PCV20 compared to PCV15 as a vaccination strategy for preventing pneumococcal diseases in children in Italy.

Methods And Materials: A cost-utility analysis (CUA) was conducted using a static Markov model adapted to the Italian context to simulate the economic and clinical effects of vaccination over a 10-year time horizon. The study adopted the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (NHS), considering only direct healthcare costs. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore parameter uncertainty.

Results: The model showed that PCV20 is a dominant strategy compared to PCV15, generating cost savings of €6.45 million and a gain of 101,708 QALYs (quality-adjusted life years). These benefits are attributed to PCV20's broader serotype coverage, which significantly reduces the incidence of invasive and non-invasive pneumococcal diseases. Vaccination with PCV20 offers substantial clinical and economic advantages over PCV15.

Conclusions: The introduction of PCV20 as a vaccination strategy for children in Italy represents a cost-effective and clinically advantageous option. Its implementation can reduce the burden of pneumococcal disease and associated healthcare costs, improving public health outcomes and the economic efficiency of the healthcare system.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2495461DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cost-utility analysis
8
public health
8
compared pcv15
8
vaccination strategy
8
pneumococcal diseases
8
healthcare costs
8
pneumococcal
5
vaccination
5
pcv20
5
italian cost-utility
4

Similar Publications