A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Prediction of major outcomes in patients with malignant hypertension using machine learning: A report from the West Birmingham malignant hypertension registry. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Malignant hypertension (MHT) is a rare, yet severe condition with high morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess the potential of machine learning (ML) algorithms in forecasting prognostic outcomes in MHT patients.

Methods: Data from the West Birmingham MHT Registry were used. We evaluated the efficacy of 9 ML algorithms, CatBoost, Decision Tree (DT), Light-Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and XGBoost in predicting a composite outcome of all-cause mortality/dialysis. Evaluation metrics included the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and F1 score. SHapley Additive exPlanations values were employed to quantify the importance of each feature.

Results: The cohort comprised 385 individuals with MHT (mean age 48 ± 13 years, 66% male). During a median follow-up of 11 (interquartile range: 3-18) years, 282 patients (73%) experienced the composite outcome. Among 24 demographic and clinical variables, 16 were selected into the ML models. The SVM, LR, and MLP models exhibited robust predictive performance, achieving AUCs of .81 (95% CI: .70-.90), .82 (95% CI: .71-.92) and .81 (95% CI: .71-.90), respectively. Furthermore, these models demonstrated high F1 scores (SVM: .75, LR: .80. MLP: .75). Age, smoking, follow-up systolic blood pressure, and baseline creatinine were commonly identified as primary prognostic features in both SVM and LR models.

Conclusions: The application of ML algorithms facilitates effective prediction of prognostic outcomes in MHT patients, illustrating their potential utility in clinical decision-making through more targeted risk stratification and individualised patient care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362051PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eci.70052DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

malignant hypertension
12
machine learning
8
west birmingham
8
prognostic outcomes
8
outcomes mht
8
composite outcome
8
svm mlp
8
mht
5
prediction major
4
major outcomes
4

Similar Publications