Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation improve out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival. However, basic life support (BLS) skills are low.
Aim: The FirstCPR cluster randomised controlled trial aimed to test the effectiveness of a community organisation-targeted BLS education and training approach.
Methods: Clusters (community organisations with 50+ members) were randomly allocated to intervention (12-month period of opportunities to access BLS education and training) or control (no intervention). Outcomes were assessed via surveys at 12 months and pre-specified analysis involved hierarchical mixed-models.
Results: Of 165 randomised clusters (82 intervention), 58% were sports and 42% were social/faith-based. Most of the intervention clusters (74/82) participated in at least one intervention activity (15 in all activities). Factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic and organisation support impacted intervention uptake. Overall 924 members, across 93 clusters (407 from 57 intervention clusters; 517 from 36 control clusters), completed surveys. At 12-months, intervention organisation surveyed members reported higher rates of: being trained and willing to perform CPR on a stranger (primary outcome: 63.8% vs 46.9 %; Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 2.22, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.50-3.30), confidence to use an automated external defibrillator (AED) (48.4% vs 26.4%; AOR:3.23, 95%CI:2.22-4.71) and willingness to use AEDs on a stranger (73.9% vs 62.9%; AOR:1.84, 95%CI:1.22-2.80).
Conclusions: The results should be interpreted cautiously as the survey response rates were very low. However, survey respondents showed desired outcomes and key learnings for future research were gained.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12005295 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100949 | DOI Listing |