Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) are a heterogeneous group of chronic conditions without a known organic etiology, with a significant socio-economic impact. In clinical practice, challenges remain in accurately assessing DGBI symptoms. Accurate interpretation and communication of the symptom pattern are imperative for a correct diagnosis. Hence, our group recently developed a Rome criteria-based Waiting Room Questionnaire (WRQ) with pictograms for visual support to improve symptom identification. This cross-sectional study aims to validate the WRQ for symptom assessment and DGBI diagnosis.
Methods: In a tertiary care multicentric study, 245 ambulatory patients (71% female, 41 ± 19.4 years old) completed the WRQ. The clarity and added value were recorded by the patients. The concordance between diagnosis based on the WRQ most bothersome symptom and the expert clinician's diagnosis were compared.
Results: Based on the expert opinion of clinicians, 53 patients were primarily diagnosed with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), 66 with postprandial distress syndrome (PDS), 36 with epigastric pain syndrome (EPS), 57 with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and 26 with chronic nausea/vomiting syndrome (CNVS). Pictograms entailed an added value according to 88% of the patients, and 95% of the patients understood all questions. Overall, patients' answers on the WRQ were highly reliable. Inter-rater agreement was substantial (Cohen's kappa = 0.72) with an overall concordance of 78% between expert opinion and the most bothersome symptom reported on the WRQ.
Conclusion: The WRQ is a comprehensive and reliable tool facilitating the diagnosis of patients with DGBI.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70019 | DOI Listing |