A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Efficacy and Toxicity of Pemigatinib in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma Harboring FGFR Fusions or Rearrangements: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Efficacy and Toxicity of Pemigatinib in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma Harboring FGFR Fusions or Rearrangements: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Target Oncol

Department of Oncology, OncoHealth Institute, Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias FJD, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Avda Reyes Catolicos 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.

Published: May 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The efficacy and safety of pemigatinib in advanced cholangiocarcinoma (aCCA) were presented in phase I-II trials and retrospective reports, with small sample sizes and variable results.

Methods: A systematic literature search included studies investigating the efficacy/safety of pemigatinib in aCCA harboring FGFR fusions/rearrangements. Primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). A pooled proportion meta-analysis was performed.

Results: Three hundred and twenty-seven patients in eight studies were included (three phase-II, one phase-I/II, two phase-I, and two retrospective). In the pooled analyses, the median age was 58.9 years (95% confidence interval (CI): 51.9-65.8); 33.4% (95% CI: 28.1-39.0) were male. Pemigatinib was the second-line treatment in 58.5% (95% CI: 52.7-64.1) and was beyond second-line in the remaining. ORR was 42.2% (95% CI: 35.9-48.7) (I:48.4%) and disease control rate (DCR) was 86.5% (95% CI: 81.6-90.5) (I: 58.8%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.8 months (95% CI: 6.2-9.4) (I: 11.6%). Two studies reported overall survival (OS) (median 17.5 and 17.1 months). The most common AEs (any grade) were hyperphosphatemia (46%), dysgeusia (33.2%), alopecia (31.4%), fatigue (30.9%), stomatitis (28.5%), and diarrhea (27.5%). Cumulative eye and nail toxicities were observed in 32.5% and 40.9%, and retinal detachment in 5.5%.

Conclusion: This analysis emphasizes the FGFR alteration testing and pemigatinib use in the second-line and beyond treatment of aCCA.

Registration Id (prospero): CRD42024627459.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11523-025-01142-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pemigatinib advanced
8
advanced cholangiocarcinoma
8
harboring fgfr
8
pemigatinib second-line
8
second-line treatment
8
95%
6
pemigatinib
5
efficacy toxicity
4
toxicity pemigatinib
4
cholangiocarcinoma harboring
4

Similar Publications