Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background Identification and preservation of the facial nerve trunk (FNT) are critical during parotidectomy to prevent complications such as facial paralysis. Due to its anatomical proximity and accessibility, the posterior belly of the digastric muscle (PBDM) has emerged as a consistent and reliable intraoperative landmark for localizing the FNT. This study aims to review the experience of a single institution in superficial parotidectomy, with a focus on identifying the FNT using the PBDM. Methods This retrospective observational study reviewed 24 cases of parotidectomy performed at Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, from January 2021 to January 2024. Inclusion criteria included patients with parotid tumors, excluding those with preoperative facial nerve palsy or prior head and neck radiation or surgery. Key anatomical landmarks, such as the PBDM and tragal pointer, were used to identify the FNT. Results The PBDM was consistently identified as a reliable landmark. The FNT was located approximately 15-20 mm (17 ± 0.87 mm) superior and medial to the insertion of the PBDM. The distance from the PBDM to the FNT in this study was significantly greater compared to previous studies (p < 0.001), reinforcing its reliability as a consistent anatomical landmark. No cases of facial nerve paresis were observed. Conclusion The PBDM is a reliable and consistent landmark for FNT identification, minimizing the risk of facial nerve injury. This approach is valuable for optimizing outcomes in parotid surgery.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983623 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.80413 | DOI Listing |