Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Health care organizations are building, deploying, and self-governing digital health technologies (DHTs), including artificial intelligence, at an increasing rate. This scope necessitates expertise and quality infrastructure to ensure that the technology impacting patient care is safe, effective, and ethical throughout its lifecycle. The objective of this article is to describe Mayo Clinic's approach for embedding internal accountability as a case study for other health care institutions seeking modalities for responsible implementation of artificial intelligence-enabled DHTs. Mayo Clinic aims to enable and empower innovators by (1) building internal skills and expertise, (2) establishing a centralized review board, and (3) aligning development and deployment processes with regulations, standards, and best practices. In 2022, Mayo Clinic established the Software as a Medical Device Review Board (The Board), an independent body of physicians and domain experts to represent the organization in providing innovators regulatory and risk mitigation recommendations for DHTs. Hundreds of digital health product teams have since benefited from this function, intended to enable responsible innovation in alignment with regulation and state-of-the-art quality management practices. Other health care institutions can adopt similar internal accountability bodies using this framework. Opportunity remains to iterate on Mayo Clinic's approach in alignment with advancing best practices and enhance representation on The Board as part of standard continuous improvement practices.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975809PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.08.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

health care
16
internal accountability
12
care institutions
12
mayo clinic
12
embedding internal
8
safe effective
8
effective ethical
8
implementation artificial
8
artificial intelligence
8
case study
8

Similar Publications

Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore contributing factors identified in serious incident investigations conducted by internal, independent multidisciplinary teams.

Methods: A total of 166 serious incident investigation reports, conducted between 2018 and 2023 in 11 integrated social and health care organizations in Finland, were analyzed. The reports were classified by incident type and contributing factor, which were analyzed using the WHO's Conceptual Framework for the International Classification for Patient Safety.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Chest radiography is often performed preoperatively as a common diagnostic tool. However, chest radiography carries the risk of radiation exposure. Given the uncertainty surrounding the utility of preoperative chest radiographs, physicians require systematically developed recommendations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The fourth phase of the Electronic Medical Records and Genome Network (eMERGE4) is testing the return of 10 polygenic risk scores (PRS) across multiple clinics. Understanding the perspectives of health-system leaders and frontline clinicians can inform plans for implementation of PRS.

Methods: Fifteen health-system leaders and 20 primary care providers (PCPs) took part in semi-structured interviews.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To assess changes in greenhouse gas emission rates associated with the use of anaesthetic gases (desflurane, sevoflurane, and isoflurane) in Australian health care during 2002-2022, overall and by state or territory and hospital type.

Study Design: Retrospective descriptive analysis of IQVIA anaesthetic gases purchasing data.

Setting: All Australian public and private hospitals, 1 January 2002 - 31 December 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF