A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Optimal filtering strategies for task-specific functional PET imaging. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Functional Positron Emission Tomography (fPET) is an effective tool for studying dynamic processes in glucose metabolism and neurotransmitter action, providing insights into brain function and disease progression. However, optimizing signal processing to extract stimulation-specific information remains challenging. This study systematically evaluates state-of-the-art filtering techniques for fPET imaging. Forty healthy participants performed a cognitive task (Tetris®) during [F]FDG PET/MR scans. Seven filtering techniques and multiple hyperparameters were tested: including 3D and 4D Gaussian smoothing, highly constrained backprojection (HYPR), iterative HYPR (IHYPR4D), MRI-Markov Random Field (MRI-MRF) filters, and dynamic/extended dynamic Non-Local Means (dNLM/edNLM). Filters were assessed based on test-retest reliability, task signal identifiability (temporal signal-to-noise ratio, tSNR), spatial task-based activation, and sample size calculations were assessed. Compared to 3D Gaussian smoothing, edNLM, dNLM, MRI-MRF L = 10, and IHYPR4D filters improved tSNR, while edNLM and HYPR enhanced test-retest reliability. Spatial task-based activation was enhanced by NLM filters and MRI-MRF approaches. The edNLM filter reduced the required sample size by 15.4%. Simulations supported these findings. This study highlights the strengths and limitations of fPET filtering techniques, emphasizing how hyperparamter adjustments affect outcome parameters. The edNLM filter shows promise with improved performance across all metrics, but filter selection should consider specific study objectives and resource constraints.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409040PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271678X251325668DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

filtering techniques
12
gaussian smoothing
8
test-retest reliability
8
spatial task-based
8
task-based activation
8
sample size
8
ednlm filter
8
optimal filtering
4
filtering strategies
4
strategies task-specific
4

Similar Publications