98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: There is evidence that consumer and community involvement (CCI) improves the quality and outcomes of health research. However, there is currently limited support for organisations to plan, implement and evaluate CCI activity. We aimed to codesign an audit tool that will enable organisations, researchers, community members and funders to measure the extent and nature of CCI in their respective settings. The tool was based on the Western Australian Health Translation Network's CCI Handbook.
Methods: We offered optional online workshops to inform participants about the study (total n = 9). Following this, we obtained feedback on the appropriateness of the Handbook and audit tool (n = 11). Finally, using Qualtrics surveys, we assessed the quality and effectiveness of the tool in evaluating CCI with 10 researchers, 6 funders, and 1 community member (total n = 17) sourced from networks within Monash University and the Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science.
Results: Overall participants had a positive response to the audit tool and believed it had value in quantifying direct implementation of CCI in their workplaces. Gaps identified included the need to address health and research literacy of community members, culturally responsive approaches when working with community members from migrant backgrounds and an identified need for visual and digital resources.
Conclusions: Application of the tool enabled participants to identify their respective CCI strengths, weakness and opportunities for improving the meaningful involvement of community members and community in their research activities and to support equity in these processes.
Patient Or Public Contribution: The public participated in workshops providing feedback on the general structure of the audit tool as well as testing it within their research projects.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11958596 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.70249 | DOI Listing |
Nurs Health Sci
September 2025
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing globally. We aimed to understand stakeholders' perspectives on factors driving CS in pregnancy care to inform areas for intervention. Stakeholders from five health services participated in three Group Model Building workshops to identify the drivers of CS and intervention opportunities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFESC Heart Fail
September 2025
School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Glasgow, UK.
Aims: To help avoid therapeutic inertia, we developed a pragmatic treatment score (QUAD Score) for use in daily practice by healthcare professionals managing patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% and heart failure. We now investigate the association between achieved QUAD scores and 1 year outcomes.
Methods: This was a multicentre cohort study in consecutive patients with incident heart failure and LVEF <50%, who completed therapy titration between January 2021 and June 2023.
Equine Vet J
September 2025
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies Equine Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Background: Surgical safety checklists have demonstrated a positive impact on post-surgical morbidity/mortality in human medicine, and likely have an equal benefit in veterinary medicine. To realise their advantages, they must be correctly and regularly used. A clinical audit was planned to assess this.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFVet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract
September 2025
Kinder Ground, Byrdstown, TN, USA. Electronic address:
Animal welfare assessments on farms have been used to enforce minimum standards to maintain market access but have delivered limited improvement in the overall welfare of farm animals. Veterinarians are uniquely positioned to incorporate animal welfare assessment into practice as a diagnostic tool for continuous improvement promoting the welfare of animals in production. Practical assessment of welfare does not have to emulate or duplicate audits that may already be done by outside parties to meet supplier contracts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMed Phys
August 2025
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Background: To guarantee high-quality patient scans, thorough quality assurance (QA) of SPECT or gamma cameras, including performance, review, and documentation, is essential.
Purpose: We developed a novel Nuclear Medicine Quality Assurance server (NMQA) with an AI deep learning (AIDL) optical character recognition (OCR) system to automate QA data retrieval and review from SPECT and gamma cameras. The system extracts and compares daily and weekly QA data against specifications.