Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization in patients receiving maintenance dialysis is unclear.

Objective: To compare the rates of clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization in patients receiving maintenance dialysis (in-center and home modalities) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Design: Population-based, repeated cross-sectional study.

Setting: Linked administrative healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada.

Patients: Adults receiving maintenance dialysis from March 15, 2017, to March 14, 2020 (pre-COVID-19 pandemic period) and from March 15, 2020, to March 14, 2023 (COVID-19 pandemic period).

Measurements: Our primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Our secondary outcomes included non-COVID-19-related mortality, all-cause hospitalizations (excluding elective surgeries), emergency room visits, intensive care unit admissions, and hospital admissions with mechanical ventilation. We also examined cardiovascular-related hospitalizations, kidney-related outcomes, and ambulatory visits.

Methods: We used Poisson generalized estimating equations to model pre-COVID outcome trends and used these to predict post-COVID outcomes and to estimate the relative change (i.e., the ratio of the observed to the expected rate).

Results: In 31 900 individuals receiving maintenance dialysis during the study period, the crude incidence rate (per 1000 person-years) of all-cause mortality was 165.0 in the pre-COVID-19 period, compared to 173.2 during the first year of the pandemic and 171.7 during the first 36 months of the pandemic. After adjustment, there was a statistically significant increase in all-cause mortality in 14 out of the 36 months of the COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, with 494 recorded COVID-19-related deaths. However, when examining the overall all-cause mortality across the months, the adjusted relative rate (aRR) comparing the observed to expected all-cause mortality rate was not statistically significant in the first year of the pandemic (1.08, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.16) and the first 36 months of the pandemic (1.08, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.18) compared to the pre-pandemic period. The crude incidence rate of non-COVID-19-related mortality was 165.0 in the pre-COVID-19 period, compared to 163.3 during the first year of the pandemic and 157.7 during the first 36 months. After adjustment, there was no substantial change in the rate of non-COVID-19-related deaths in the first year of the pandemic (aRR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.09), but there was a substantial decrease in all-cause hospitalization, with an aRR of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.97), and a substantial decrease in emergency room visits and intensive care unit admissions; findings were consistent 36 months into the pandemic.

Limitations: External generalizability to other jurisdictions may be limited, with each region experiencing different COVID-19 rates and implementing different mitigation strategies.

Conclusions: In the maintenance dialysis population, all-cause mortality was significantly higher during several months of the pandemic; however, the overall rate of all-cause mortality was not substantially higher than expected in the first 36 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no substantial increase in non-COVID-19-related mortality despite a substantial decrease in acute healthcare utilization. Ongoing monitoring of the dialysis population will offer further insights into the long-term effects of the pandemic.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954382PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20543581251328077DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

all-cause mortality
28
maintenance dialysis
24
receiving maintenance
20
healthcare utilization
16
covid-19 pandemic
16
year pandemic
16
pandemic
13
clinical outcomes
12
outcomes healthcare
12
utilization patients
12

Similar Publications

Background: Long-term outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TEER) are compared with medical therapy remain under investigation. This study evaluated the 3-year effects of MitraClip on mitral regurgitation (MR) severity, ventricular remodeling, and clinical outcomes in high surgical-risk patients.

Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort included 31 MitraClip patients (2016-2023) and 30 contemporaneous controls on maximally tolerated guideline-directed medical therapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation and Exercise-Induced Changes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging

September 2025

Department of Cardiology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium. Electronic address:

Background: Atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) is prevalent among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and associated with adverse outcome, yet this bidirectional association remains underexplored.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the pathophysiological and prognostic significance of AFMR in HFpEF, both at rest and during exercise.

Methods: In this multicenter cohort study, consecutive patients with HFpEF underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing with echocardiography, with a particular focus on mitral regurgitation (MR) severity assessment in rest and during exercise.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background The prognostic value of baseline visual emphysema scoring at low-dose CT (LDCT) in lung cancer screening cohorts is unknown. Purpose To determine whether a single visual emphysema score at LDCT is predictive of 25-year mortality from all causes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Materials and Methods In this prospective cohort study, asymptomatic adults aged 40-85 years with a history of smoking underwent baseline LDCT screening for lung cancer between June 2000 and December 2008.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The aim of this article is to compare the long-term efficacy of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) versus Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT) in reducing mortality among adult patients with uncomplicated Stanford type B aortic dissection (uSTBAD).

Methods: An electronic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central and Google Scholar was conducted for studies comparing TEVAR with OMT for mortality in adult patients with uSTBAD. Relevant outcomes, including mortality, aortic rupture, re-intervention, retrograde type A dissection, myocardial infarction and stroke were analyzed and presented as risk ratios (RRs) along with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are increasingly used in management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. Beyond glycemic control, these agents may influence orthopaedic outcomes. This study aimed to assess the relationship between preoperative GLP-1 RA use and postoperative complications in T2DM patients undergoing operative ankle fracture repair.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF