Outcomes of Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and Non-Indigenous Australians.

Ann Vasc Surg

Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia; Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, Queensland, Australia; Australian Institute of Tropica

Published: July 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Australia's Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples are at high risk of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), but outcomes of revascularization are unknown. Revascularization outcomes were compared among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous Australians.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients who underwent lower limb revascularization between January 2015 and July 2023. PAD severity was defined using the Rutherford classification and angiographic scoring systems (ANGIO score, Global Limb Anatomic Staging System [GLASS], Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus). The primary outcome was major adverse limb events (MALE), that is, major amputation or repeat revascularization. The secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major amputation, and repeat revascularization alone.

Results: A total of 504 patients were included. Fifty-seven (11.3%) were Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People, who were more likely to present with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (74% vs. 65%; P = 0.01) and have infrapopliteal disease (GLASS: odds ratio [OR] 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.15-3.24; P = 0.013; ANGIO score: OR 1.97, 1.18-3.29; P = 0.01) compared to non-Indigenous Australians. Risk of MALE (rate ratio [RR] 1.39; 0.91-2.13; P = 0.126) and repeat revascularization (RR 1.18, 0.74-1.88; P = 0.493) were similar, but Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People had a higher risk of major amputation (RR 3.35; 1.66-6.75; P = 0.001) and MACE (RR 1.88, 1.17-3.03; P = 0.009) than non-Indigenous participants. Adjusted analyses suggested the increased risk of major amputation was due to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People presenting with more severe PAD and tissue loss compared to non-Indigenous patients.

Conclusion: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples present with more severe PAD and have greater risk of major amputation. Culturally appropriate programs are needed to raise awareness and promote secondary prevention.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.03.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aboriginal torres
28
torres strait
28
strait islander
28
major amputation
20
islander peoples
12
repeat revascularization
12
islander people
12
risk major
12
outcomes revascularization
8
non-indigenous australians
8

Similar Publications

Overview: We analysed Australian Immunisation Register (AIR) data, predominantly for National Immunisation Program funded vaccines, as at 2 April 2023 for children, adolescents and adults, focusing on the calendar year 2022 and on trends from previous years. This report aims to provide comprehensive analysis and interpretation of vaccination coverage data to inform immunisation policy and programs.

Children: Fully vaccinated coverage in Australian children in 2022 was 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Education of First Nations Australians about cancer-what evidence is there around its effectiveness? A narrative review.

Lancet Reg Health West Pac

August 2025

Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, University of Western Australia, 167 Fitzgerald Street, Geraldton, Western Australia, 6530, Australia.

Poorer cancer prevention and control outcomes for First Nations Australians have resulted in a need for improved health literacy, that is their capacity as individuals to access, understand, and use information in ways that promote and maintain good health. This narrative review explores the evidence on how education programs work to improve First Nations Australians' understanding of cancer, and how this leads to more effective use of prevention, screening and treatment services. Limited to the Australian context, a bibliographic search using terms structured around four main concepts: Aboriginal, Cancer, Australia, and Intervention (health literacy, health promotion) was undertaken in May 2024 for publications from January 2000.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Compared to adult cancer in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations, minimal research has focussed on cancer in Indigenous Australian children. This narrative review examined published information about incidence, mortality, barriers to diagnosis and treatment, and psychosocial needs and interventions for Indigenous Australian children with cancer. Most papers were epidemiological, investigating incidence and mortality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (hereafter respectfully named Indigenous) Australians are diagnosed with some cancers substantially more frequently than non-Indigenous Australians implying a different risk factor landscape. Additionally, poorer outcomes for certain cancers are exacerbated by lower cancer screening rates and later diagnoses compared to non-Indigenous Australians. An improved understanding of cancer causation would allow better shaping and targeting of screening programs for those at the highest risk.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF