98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), one of the most dreaded complications after pancreatic surgery, can be predicted from preoperative imaging and tabular clinical routine data. However, existing studies suffer from limited clinical applicability due to a need for manual data annotation and a lack of external validation. We propose AutoFRS (automated fistula risk score software), an externally validated end-to-end prediction tool for POPF risk stratification based on multimodal preoperative data.
Materials And Methods: We trained AutoFRS on preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging and clinical data from 108 patients undergoing pancreatic head resection and validated it on an external cohort of 61 patients. Prediction performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and balanced accuracy. In addition, model performance was compared to the updated alternative fistula risk score (ua-FRS), the current clinical gold standard method for intraoperative POPF risk stratification.
Results: AutoFRS achieved an AUC of 0.81 and a balanced accuracy of 0.72 in internal validation and an AUC of 0.79 and a balanced accuracy of 0.70 in external validation. In a patient subset with documented intraoperative POPF risk factors, AutoFRS (AUC: 0.84 ± 0.05) performed on par with the uaFRS (AUC: 0.85 ± 0.06). The AutoFRS web application facilitates annotation-free prediction of POPF from preoperative imaging and clinical data based on the AutoFRS prediction model.
Conclusion: POPF can be predicted from multimodal clinical routine data without human data annotation, automating the risk prediction process. We provide additional evidence of the clinical feasibility of preoperative POPF risk stratification and introduce a software pipeline for future prospective evaluation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12165562 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002327 | DOI Listing |
Langenbecks Arch Surg
September 2025
Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland.
Purpose: Pancreatic cancer usually affects the elderly as 70% of new diagnoses are made in patients older than 65 years. A risk factor for postoperative complications is the accumulation of comorbidities and functional decline, which together define "frailty". The aim of the current study was to assess the impact of frailty on postoperative recovery after pancreatic surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
September 2025
Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Background: Despite advances in surgical techniques, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a major concern after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Although various risk factors have been identified, most are patient-specific and nonmodifiable. This study investigated whether the time from pancreatic division to anastomosis (division-to-anastomosis time, DAT) influences postoperative outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Surg
August 2025
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the risk factors for postoperative intraluminal hemorrhage (IPPH) after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD), with the aim of enhancing clinical management through the exploration and development of a risk prediction model with those factors.
Method: The clinical data of 326 hospitalized patients between January 2020 and August 2023 who underwent LPD for malignancies were retrospectively selected. The data consisted of general conditions, comorbidities, preoperative treatments, laboratory tests, and postoperative complications.
World J Methodol
September 2025
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna 801507, Bihar, India.
Background: Historically intraoperative drains were employed after pancreatic surgery but over the last decade, there has been debate over the routine usage of drains.
Aim: To assess the necessity of intra-abdominal drain placement, identify the most effective drain type, and determine the optimal timing for drain removal.
Methods: A systematic review of electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and Google Scholar, was conducted using Medical Subject Headings and keywords until December 2023.
Langenbecks Arch Surg
August 2025
Department of Medical Sciences, Federal Fluminense University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Background: Prophylactic abdominal drainage has been widely used in pancreatic surgery to mitigate postoperative morbidity. Nonetheless, recent evidence suggests that a no-drain policy presents similar results to routine drainage. Therefore, we conducted an updated meta-analysis on this topic to provide up to date clinical recommendations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF