A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Impact of Resection Margin Status on Recurrence and Possible Candidates for Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Resected Distal Cholangiocarcinoma. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the prognostic impact of resection margin in distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCC).

Background: Due to the relatively low prevalence of dCC in Western countries and the use of various definitions of resection margin status, the prognostic impact of bile duct resection margin status remains unclear.

Methods: This study included consecutive patients who underwent curative surgery and were diagnosed with dCC between 2000 and 2022. Bile duct resection margin status was classified as clear margin, low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and tumor present.

Results: Of the 587 patients, 506 (86.2%), 17 (2.9%), 42 (7.2%), and 22 (3.7%) patients had clear margin, LGD, HGD, and tumor present at the margin, respectively. In the node-negative group, patients with clear margin (42.5%) had significantly lower 5-year cumulative overall recurrence rates compared with those with LGD (64.3%), HGD (74.4%), and tumor present status (100.0%). However, in the node-positive group, no significant differences were found in the 5-year cumulative recurrence rates among patients with clear margin (68.8%), HGD (91.1%), and tumor present status (75.0%). In addition, among the node-negative group with a non-clear margin, patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy showed significantly lower 5-year cumulative recurrence rates compared with those who did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy (69.5% versus 87.5%, P=0.037).

Conclusions: Local treatment, including surgery and radiotherapy, may be crucial in node-negative patients but may have limited impact in node-positive patients. In node-positive patients, surgery without clinical deterioration, along with the timely initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, may be crucial.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006712DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

resection margin
20
margin status
16
clear margin
16
adjuvant radiotherapy
12
patients clear
12
5-year cumulative
12
cumulative recurrence
12
recurrence rates
12
margin
11
patients
9

Similar Publications