A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Male and Female Patients With and Without Depression: an Electronic Health Record Evaluation in Wales. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aim: To investigate rates of cardiovascular risk factor assessment (blood pressure, lipid and QRISK score) in routine clinical practice for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with and without depression.

Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study using electronic health record data sources was carried out. Rates of blood pressure measurement, lipid checks and QRISK documentation in primary care were calculated for non-depressed, and patients prior and subsequent to depression diagnosis. Poisson regression adjusting for age and sex was used to explore associations between depression status and rate of assessment. Differences in rates of assessment by deprivation and location of residence (urban/rural) were also explored.

Results: Of 2,290,075 patients, 176,062 had depression diagnosed. Patients with depression had blood pressure and lipid levels checked and QRISK score documented more frequently, after adjustment for sex and age group. Sex differences were noted, with younger females more likely to have blood pressure assessment and males more likely to have lipid levels checked, irrespective of depression status. There were significant three-way interactions between depression*sex*age group for all outcomes, with sex difference in blood pressure assessment highly dependent on age, and sex/depression status difference in lipid assessment most notable in the 60-74 age group.

Conclusion: Patients with depression are more likely to have their blood pressure, lipid levels and QRISK documented than patients without depression. Sex differences in assessment of blood pressure and lipid assessments may also impact on future cardiovascular risk management, providing opportunities for potential improvements in assessment of risk factors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf178DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

blood pressure
28
patients depression
16
pressure lipid
16
cardiovascular risk
12
lipid levels
12
assessment
9
depression
8
electronic health
8
health record
8
assessment blood
8

Similar Publications