98%
921
2 minutes
20
As is well known, the Turing Test proposes the possibility of distinguishing the behavior of a machine from that of a human being through an experimental session. The Turing Test assesses whether a person asking questions to two different entities, can tell from their answers which of them is the human being and which is the machine. With the progress of Artificial Intelligence, the number of contexts in which the capacities of response of a machine will be indistinguishable from those of a human being is expected to increase rapidly. In order to configure a Turing Test in which it is possible to distinguish human behavior from machine behavior independently from the advances of Artificial Intelligence, at least in the short-medium term, it would be important to base it not on the differences between man and machine in terms of performance and dialogue capacity, but on some specific characteristic of the human mind that cannot be reproduced by the machine even in principle. We studied a new kind of test based on the hypothesis that such characteristic of the human mind exists and can be made experimentally evident. This peculiar characteristic is the emotional content of human cognition and, more specifically, its link with memory enhancement. To validate this hypothesis we recorded the EEG signals of 39 subjects that underwent a specific test and analyzed their signals with a neural network able to label similar signal patterns with similar binary codes. The results showed that, with a statistically significant difference, the test participants more easily recognized images associated in the past with an emotional reaction than those not associated with such a reaction. This distinction in our view is not accessible to a software system, even AI-based, and a Turing Test based on this feature of the mind may make distinguishable human versus machine responses.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107362 | DOI Listing |
Schizophr Bull
September 2025
MIT linQ, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.
Background And Hypothesis: Loose Associations (LA) in speech are key indicators of psychosis risk, notably in schizophrenia. Current detection methods are hampered by subjective evaluation, small samples, and poor generalizability. We hypothesize that combining Large Language Models (LLMs) with machine learning techniques could enhance objective identification of LA through improved semantic and probabilistic linguistic measures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJAMA Oncol
September 2025
Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Importance: Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is associated with limited survival and few treatment options. Photon involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) is the most common radiotherapy treatment for patients with LM from solid tumors.
Objective: To assess whether proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) would result in superior central nervous system progression-free survival (CNS-PFS) compared with IFRT.
JAMA Cardiol
September 2025
Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Importance: Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is a well-established contributor to cardiovascular morbidity, mediated by intermittent hypoxemia, autonomic dysregulation, and endothelial dysfunction. Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) may be especially at risk for SDB, but the clinical impact of SDB in this population remains unclear.
Objective: To define the prevalence and subtypes of SDB in HCM and examine their association with echocardiographic parameters and cardiac biomarker expression.
Sci Rep
September 2025
Department of Applied Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), 2001 Longxiang Boulevard, 518172, Shenzhen, China.
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have highlighted their potential to predict human decisions. In two studies, we compared predictions by GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 across 51 scenarios (9,600 responses) against published data from 2,104 human participants within an evolutionary-psychology framework.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOnline J Public Health Inform
August 2025
College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 1841 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, United States, 1 6142924647.
Background: Threats to data integrity have always existed in online human subjects research, but it appears these threats have become more common and more advanced in recent years. Researchers have proposed various techniques to address satisficers, repeat participants, bots, and fraudulent participants; yet, no synthesis of this literature has been conducted.
Objective: This study undertakes a scoping review of recent methods and ethical considerations for addressing threats to data integrity in online research.