A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Comparison of Two-Screw versus Four-Screw Internal Fixation on Fusion Speed in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. | LitMetric

Comparison of Two-Screw versus Four-Screw Internal Fixation on Fusion Speed in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.

Published: March 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background Context: The insertion process of the new two-screw internal fixation is simpler than that of four-screw internal fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, it is unclear whether there is a difference in fusion rate.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the time required to achieve osseous fusion and the clinical efficacy of four-screw versus two-screw internal fixation.

Study Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial.

Patient Sample: From October 2021 to April 2023, eighty patients diagnosed with single-level cervical spondylosis were recruited and randomly allocated into a four- or two-screw group.

Outcome Measures: The primary endpoint was the fusion rate six months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the prevalence of complications and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale scores for arm and neck pain.

Methods: Patients were randomized to receive four-screw internal fixation (n=40) or two-screw internal fixation (n=40).

Results: A total of 77 patients completed the trial and were included in the analysis. No significant differences were observed between groups at baseline. The fusion rate in the two-screw group was significantly higher than that in the four-screw group (69.2% vs. 42.1%, P=0.022) at six months postoperatively. No significant difference was found in the fusion rates at 3 and 12 months postoperatively between groups. Overall, PROMs significantly improved after surgery in both groups and did not differ significantly between groups at any follow-up time point. The prevalence of complications was not significantly different between groups.

Conclusions: Two-screw internal fixation can achieve osseous fusion faster than four-screw internal fixation in ACDF. Two-screw internal fixation seems to achieve the same PROMs and safety as four-screw internal fixation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005334DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

internal fixation
36
four-screw internal
20
two-screw internal
20
months postoperatively
12
internal
10
fixation
9
fusion
9
anterior cervical
8
cervical discectomy
8
discectomy fusion
8

Similar Publications