A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Utility of Existing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Identifying Non-Rhinogenic Facial Pain. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: Facial pain/pressure is often non-rhinogenic and migraine-related in etiology. However, this is frequently misdiagnosed as sinusitis, leading to inappropriate antibiotic utilization and unnecessary procedures. We assessed the utility of the 3-Item Identify Migraine (ID Migraine) and the 22-Item Sinonasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-22) in differentiating rhinogenic vs. non-rhinogenic facial pain/pressure (NRFP).

Methods: Patients presenting to the rhinology clinic with a complaint of facial pain/pressure completed the ID Migraine and SNOT-22. A diagnosis of CRS or NRFP was given based on imaging criteria. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) were determined to evaluate the ability of the PROMs to identify NRFP.

Results: Of the 251 patients enrolled, 114 had CRS and 137 had NRFP. Mean (SD) age was 50 (16), and 69.3% (n = 174) were women. The ID Migraine had a positive predictive value of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.57 to 0.74) and a negative predictive value of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.48 to 0.66), with an AUC of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.58 to 0.71). The SNOT-22 had an AUC of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.58 to 0.71) using the combined five domain scores, with the function domain score having the highest AUC at 0.60 (95% CI: 0.53 to 0.67).

Conclusion: Existing PROMs have limitations when used to identify NRFP in patients presenting with facial pain/pressure. A screening questionnaire developed and validated specifically for this purpose would assist clinicians in early diagnosis and appropriate management of these patients. Given the high incidence of NRFP, this measure could significantly improve healthcare efficiency.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.32147DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

facial pain/pressure
16
non-rhinogenic facial
8
patients presenting
8
auc 064
8
064 95%
8
95% 058
8
058 071
8
facial
5
95%
5
utility existing
4

Similar Publications