A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

The relationship between auditory brainstem responses, cognitive ability, and speech-in-noise perception among young adults with normal hearing thresholds. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The goal of this research was to determine the contributions of auditory neural processing and cognitive abilities to predict performance on a speech-in-noise perception task in young, normal hearing adults. Two experiments were performed, each with separate cohorts of ∼30 young adults with normal hearing who performed a competing talker task which included a high-pass filtered condition that was designed to be more sensitive to auditory nerve functioning than are commonly used speech-in-noise perception tests. Predictors of performance on this competing talker task included ABR waves I and V metrics and cognitive test scores. Experiment one included click ABRs at a moderate level commensurate with the level of the competing talker task, as well as the cognitive digit span working memory test. Experiment two included high-intensity click clinical ABRs and three cognitive tests from the NIH Toolbox V3 that assessed working memory, cognitive flexibility and attention, and inhibitory control: List Sorting Working Memory, Dimensional Change Card Sort, and Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention tests, respectively. Performance on the high-pass filtered competing talker task varied across participants in both experiments. This variability was predicted by performance on the test of inhibitory control, but not the tests involving working memory or cognitive flexibility, nor by any of the auditory processing metrics from moderate or high-intensity click ABRs. Among two groups of young adults with normal hearing, cognitive factors with very similar demands to the competing talker task seem to play the greatest role in speech-in-noise perception.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2025.109243DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

competing talker
20
talker task
20
speech-in-noise perception
16
normal hearing
16
working memory
16
young adults
12
adults normal
12
inhibitory control
12
cognitive
8
task included
8

Similar Publications