A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Modification of the splice acceptor in CD163 exon 7 of pigs is insufficient to confer resistance to PRRSV. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

CD163 is the primary receptor for PRRSV, and its SRCR5 domain, encoded by exon 7, is crucial for supporting PRRSV infection. Previous studies have used CRISPR/Cas9 technology to remove exon 7 from the host genome, and the edited pigs were completely resistant to PRRSV infection. In this study, we used CRISPR/Cas9 technology mimicking an adenine base editor (ABE) to edit the splice acceptor site of exon 7, rendering it nonfunctional. This alteration was intended to cause exon 6 to join directly to exon 8 during mRNA processing, resulting in a mature mRNA transcript that lacks exon 7, which encodes the SRCR5 domain. Piglets carrying the exon 7 splice site modification (CD163Ex7-ABE) were successfully generated. However, these pigs remained fully susceptible to infection with a PRRSV-2 isolate. Analysis of CD163 mRNA from the CD163Ex7-ABE pigs revealed that they predominantly expressed a mature CD163 mRNA lacking exon 7. However, due to cryptic splice sites, two additional mRNA isoforms were expressed, including an in-frame variant containing all of exon 7 and an extra 48 base pairs. This likely resulted in the expression of a full-length CD163 with a 16-amino-acid insertion upstream of the SRCR5 domain, which was sufficient to render the animals susceptible to PRRSV. Overall, our results demonstrate that merely modifying the splice acceptor site of CD163 exon 7 is not sufficient to generate PRRSV-resistant pigs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2025.110450DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

splice acceptor
12
srcr5 domain
12
exon
11
cd163 exon
8
prrsv infection
8
crispr/cas9 technology
8
acceptor site
8
cd163 mrna
8
cd163
6
pigs
5

Similar Publications