Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Calcified coronary arteries pose a challenge to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Calcium modification techniques (CMTs) increase procedural length, complexity and risk. Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) is well suited to calcium identification and quantification and may offer valuable pre-procedural information. We hypothesised that CTCA could predict cases where CMT would be required during PCI. A single centre retrospective review (2021/2022) of consecutive patients who underwent PCI with a preceding CTCA demonstrating a calcified lesion in a major epicardial vessel. Blinded to the PCI strategy CTCA images were re-reviewed and calcium thickness, length, density and circumferential arc quantified. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for CMT defined optimum cut-off values. Calcium density (> 1000 HU) and calcific arc (> 180°) were proposed as a calcium planning score (CPS), with 1 point assigned per criteria met. 76 PCI procedures were included (72 patients). CMT was used in 53% at the discretion of the operator. Calcific arc, density, length and thickness had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74, 0.7, 0.67 and 0.63 respectively. There was a step-wise increase in the proportion of cases requiring CMT with increasing CPS. 0 vs. 1 point; OR 9 (1.1-82, p =.04), RR 5 (0.8-36, p =.09), 1 vs. 2 points; OR 3.2 (1.1-9.3, p =.03), RR 1.6 (1-2.3, p =.04), 0 vs. 2 points; OR 30 (3.3-272, p =.003), RR of 8 (1.3-54, p =.03). The incorporation of CTCA measured calcium density > 1000 HU and calcium arc > 180° into a calcium planning score may help with predicting the need for CMT at the time of PCI.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11982065 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-025-03371-4 | DOI Listing |