A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Predicting the need for calcium modification techniques using computed tomography coronary angiography. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Calcified coronary arteries pose a challenge to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Calcium modification techniques (CMTs) increase procedural length, complexity and risk. Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) is well suited to calcium identification and quantification and may offer valuable pre-procedural information. We hypothesised that CTCA could predict cases where CMT would be required during PCI. A single centre retrospective review (2021/2022) of consecutive patients who underwent PCI with a preceding CTCA demonstrating a calcified lesion in a major epicardial vessel. Blinded to the PCI strategy CTCA images were re-reviewed and calcium thickness, length, density and circumferential arc quantified. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for CMT defined optimum cut-off values. Calcium density (> 1000 HU) and calcific arc (> 180°) were proposed as a calcium planning score (CPS), with 1 point assigned per criteria met. 76 PCI procedures were included (72 patients). CMT was used in 53% at the discretion of the operator. Calcific arc, density, length and thickness had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74, 0.7, 0.67 and 0.63 respectively. There was a step-wise increase in the proportion of cases requiring CMT with increasing CPS. 0 vs. 1 point; OR 9 (1.1-82, p =.04), RR 5 (0.8-36, p =.09), 1 vs. 2 points; OR 3.2 (1.1-9.3, p =.03), RR 1.6 (1-2.3, p =.04), 0 vs. 2 points; OR 30 (3.3-272, p =.003), RR of 8 (1.3-54, p =.03). The incorporation of CTCA measured calcium density > 1000 HU and calcium arc > 180° into a calcium planning score may help with predicting the need for CMT at the time of PCI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11982065PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-025-03371-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

calcium modification
8
modification techniques
8
computed tomography
8
tomography coronary
8
coronary angiography
8
calcium
8
calcific arc
8
calcium planning
8
planning score
8
cps point
8

Similar Publications