Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871943 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S523409 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Global challenges in diabetes research and care: which way forward? An appraisal from the EASD Global Council.
Diabetologia
September 2025
Department of Diabetology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
This review article, developed by the EASD Global Council, addresses the growing global challenges in diabetes research and care, highlighting the rising prevalence of diabetes, the increasing complexity of its management and the need for a coordinated international response. With regard to research, disparities in funding and infrastructure between high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are discussed. The under-representation of LMIC populations in clinical trials, challenges in conducting large-scale research projects, and the ethical and legal complexities of artificial intelligence integration are also considered as specific issues.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBarriers and opportunities for a complementary medicine advisory network in pediatric oncology: perspectives from german experts.
Pediatr Hematol Oncol
September 2025
Department of Pediatrics, Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Herdecke, Herdecke, Germany.
Complementary medicine (CM) is commonly used by parents of pediatric cancer patients alongside conventional treatment, yet pediatric oncologists often feel inadequately trained to advise on CM. A collaborative project led by Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Herdecke, integrated into inpatient pediatric cancer care in four centers in Germany in the Rhine-Ruhr Region, provides CM consultations and training for pediatric oncology teams. This study aimed to identify barriers perceived by healthcare professionals regarding the implementation of a CM advisory network for parents and assess their training needs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComparison of 6-hour versus 12-hour cervical ripening balloon protocols in patients with prior cesarean delivery: A retrospective cohort study.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
September 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Objective: To compare the mode of delivery and other maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with one prior cesarean delivery undergoing labor induction with a cervical ripening balloon (CRB) for 6 h versus 12 h.
Methods: This retrospective study compared two protocols for mechanical cervical ripening: CRB placement for 12 h (12-h group, implemented from 2014 to 2017) versus 6 h (6-h group, implemented from 2020 to 2021). The study included patients with one prior low-segment cesarean delivery.
Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Health-Related Quality of Life in Diabetic Patients.
Clin Nurs Res
September 2025
Chonnam National University College of Nursing, Donggu, Gwangju, South Korea.
The increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and patients' lack of self-management awareness have led to a decline in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Studies identifying potential risk factors for HRQoL in DM patients and presenting generalized models are relatively scarce. The study aimed to develop and evaluate a machine learning (ML)-based model to predict the HRQoL in adult diabetic patients and to examine the important factors affecting HRQoL.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAppRaise: Software for Quantifying Evidence Uncertainty in Systematic Reviews Using a Posterior Mixture Model.
J Eval Clin Pract
September 2025
Health Technology Assessment Unit, Acute and Hospital-Based Care Portfolio, Ontario Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rationale: Systematic reviews are essential for evidence-based healthcare decision-making. While it is relatively straightforward to quantitatively assess random errors in systematic reviews, as these are typically reported in primary studies, the assessment of biases often remains narrative. Primary studies seldom provide quantitative estimates of biases and their uncertainties, resulting in systematic reviews rarely including such measurements.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF