A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Use of Primary Prophylaxis with G-CSF in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Undergoing Intensive Chemotherapy Does Not Affect Quality of Response. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

: The objective of our study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as primary prophylaxis in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing intensive chemotherapy. : We retrospectively analyzed 112 AML patients treated with intensive chemotherapy at Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata in Rome between January 2014 and March 2024. Patients were divided into G-CSF and non-G-CSF (nG-CSF) groups. We assessed the incidence of neutropenia, its severity and duration; duration of hospitalization and its costs; incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and septic shock; duration of antibiotic therapy (ABT) and antifungal therapy (AFT); complete remission (CR) rates; measurable residual disease (MRD) status; relapse rates; and outcomes. : G-CSF administration significantly reduced the duration of neutropenia (median 14 vs. 18 days, < 0.05) and length of hospitalization (median 28 vs. 35 days, < 0.05), in both induction and consolidation therapy. There were no significant differences in CR rates (73% vs. 67%, = 0.64), MRD negativity achievement (52% vs. 48%, = 0.68), leukemia relapse rates (43% vs. 62%, = 0.14), or overall survival (OS) (median 16.7 vs. 12.3 months, = 0.3) between G-CSF and nG-CSF groups. Thanks to a shorter hospitalization, the use of G-CSF led to €300,000 in savings over the last 4 years. : Our findings support the safety of G-CSF in AML patients, demonstrating no adverse impact on treatment response. G-CSF abbreviated the duration of neutropenia and hospitalization, highlighting its potential clinical and cost-effective role in AML treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856925PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm14041254DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intensive chemotherapy
12
primary prophylaxis
8
g-csf
8
acute myeloid
8
myeloid leukemia
8
undergoing intensive
8
aml patients
8
ng-csf groups
8
relapse rates
8
duration neutropenia
8

Similar Publications