A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Endothelin-1 as a Candidate Biomarker of Systemic Sclerosis: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Meta-Regression. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: There is an ongoing search for novel biomarkers of vascular dysfunction, extent of fibrosis and organ involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc).

Objectives: We critically appraised the studies investigating the circulating concentrations of endothelin-1 in SSc patients and healthy controls.

Design: This was a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Data Sources And Methods: We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) from inception to 15 June 2024. We assessed the risk of bias and the certainty of evidence using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist and GRADE, respectively.

Results: Endothelin-1 concentrations were significantly higher in SSc patients than in controls (26 studies; standardised mean difference, SMD = 0.98, 95% CI 0.73-1.23,  < .001; moderate certainty of evidence). In SSc patients, there were no significant differences in endothelin-1 concentrations between those with limited and diffuse cutaneous SSc (10 studies; SMD = 0.32, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.71  = .11; very low certainty), and with and without digital ulcers (5 studies; SMD = 0.82, 95% CI -0.06 to 1.69,  = .066; very low certainty), pulmonary arterial hypertension (7 studies; SMD = 0.22, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.45,  = .066; very low certainty) or interstitial lung disease (3 studies; SMD = 0.09, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.35,  = .51; very low certainty). There was limited evidence in SSc patients with different video capillaroscopy pattern and telangiectasias. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses showed significant associations between the effect size and geographical location (studies investigating SSc patients and controls), year of publication (studies investigating SSc patients with limited and diffuse cutaneous SSc), and biological matrix assessed (studies investigating SSc patients with and without digital ulcers).

Conclusion: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis highlight the potential role of endothelin-1 as a candidate biomarker of SSc. Further research is warranted to determine the utility of measuring endothelin-1 in SSc subgroups with different extent of fibrosis and organ involvement.

Registration: PROSPERO registration number - CRD42024566461.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846126PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11772719251318555DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

systemic sclerosis
8
systematic review
8
ssc patients
8
endothelin-1 candidate
4
candidate biomarker
4
biomarker systemic
4
sclerosis grade-assessed
4
grade-assessed systematic
4
review meta-analysis
4
meta-analysis meta-regression
4

Similar Publications