98%
921
2 minutes
20
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2025.02.006 | DOI Listing |
Int J Oncol
September 2025
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Following the publication of the above article, an interested reader drew to the attention of the Editorial Office that GAPDH bands featured for the U87 cell line (left‑hand panels) in Fig. 5 on p. 561 were strikingly similar to the GAPDH bands for the U118 cell line (right‑hand panels) shown in Fig.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Mol Med
August 2025
Traditional Chinese Medicine Innovation Research Center, Shenzhen Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518104, P.R. China.
Subsequently to the publication of the above paper, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that, for the JC‑1 staining experiments shown in Fig. 5F on p. 9, the 'mimic NC' and 'inhibitor' panels appeared to show the same cells, even though the green/red ratio was different comparing between the two data panels.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Mol Med
August 2025
Department of Biochemistry, Dongeui University College of Korean Medicine, Busan 614-052, Republic of Korea.
Following the publication of the above article, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that the β‑actin blots in Figs. 4B and 5B were apparently the same, even though different experimental conditions were reported for these figure parts; moreover, the data shown as the Lamin B blot in Fig. 5A had also been incorporated as the Akt data in Fig.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Mol Med
July 2025
Division of Radiation Biomedical Research, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul 01812, Republic of Korea.
Following the publication of the above article, the authors drew to the Editor's attention that two pairs of the data panels shown for the flow cytometric experiments in Fig. 3B on p. 7 had inadvertently been duplicated in the figure, such that these data were derived from the same original source, even though they were intended to have shown the results from different experiments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Dairy Sci
June 2025
INRAE, Institut Agro, PEGASE, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France.
Body condition dynamics are known to affect the different steps of reproduction in cattle (cyclicity, estrus expression, fertilization, embryo development). This has led to a widespread idea that there is an ideal-target optimal body condition, but no clear profile has yet been identified. Here we investigated the relationships between BCS profiles and reproductive performance in dairy cows.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF