Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The declining effectiveness of Intermittent Preventive Treatment in pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) due to the emergence of Plasmodium falciparum resistance highlights the need for alternative malaria prevention strategies in pregnant women. A novel approach was proposed: screening with an ultra-sensitive rapid diagnostic test and treating positive with pyronaridine-artesunate (ISTp-uRDT-PA). This trial compared the impact of both strategies on maternal malaria and anaemia, abortion, intrauterine death, birth weight, preterm delivery.

Methods: This non-inferiority trial, conducted in Kinshasa, enrolled pregnant women in their second and third trimesters. Participants in the IPTp-SP arm (n = 124) received SP at monthly antenatal visit as per guidelines, while those in the ISTp-uRDT-PA arm (n = 126) were screened monthly with an uRDT and treated with PA if positive. Primary outcomes included asymptomatic parasitaemia (uRDT positive without fever) or symptomatic parasitaemia (uRDT positive with fever or history of fever, and parasite density by microscopy during pregnancy.

Results: Asymptomatic parasitaemia by uRDT during pregnancy was similar in both arms (20.8% in IPTp-SP vs 21.0% in ISTp-uRDT-PA). At delivery, asymptomatic parasitaemia was 51% higher in ISTp-uRDT-PA arm compared to IPTp-SP (cRR = 1.51 [95% CI 0.76-3.00], p = 0.24). Symptomatic parasitaemia by uRDT at delivery showed no significant difference. Malaria by microscopy at enrolment was detected in 34.4% of women. Malaria by microscopy during pregnancy was 9.6% in IPTp-SP and 10.1%. ISTp-uRDT-PA (p = 0.19), decreasing to 3.2% and 0.9%, respectively, at delivery (p = 0.24). Mean haemoglobin concentration at enrolment was 10.1 g/dl in the IPTp-SP and 9.8 g/dl in the ISTp-uRDT-PA with no significant difference in maternal anaemia at delivery (7%; cRR = 1.07 [95% CI 0.87-1.31], p = 0.52). No significant differences were found for spontaneous abortions and in utero death in both arms. The risk of a premature newborn declined by 14% in ISTp-uRDT-PA compared to the IPTp-SP arm (cRR = 0.86 [95% CI 0.29-2.85], p = 0.79) while low-birth-weight was not significantly higher (cRR = 1.74 [95% CI 0.86-3.53], p = 0.12).

Conclusion: ISTp-uRDT-PA was non inferior to IPTp-SP and can be considered as a future alternative for IPTp-SP in case this intervention can no longer be used due to high SP resistance.

Clinical Trials Registration: NCT04783051.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846385PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05260-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

parasitaemia urdt
16
pregnant women
12
asymptomatic parasitaemia
12
iptp-sp
9
screening ultra-sensitive
8
rapid diagnostic
8
diagnostic test
8
preventive treatment
8
malaria prevention
8
istp-urdt-pa
8

Similar Publications

Background: The declining effectiveness of Intermittent Preventive Treatment in pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) due to the emergence of Plasmodium falciparum resistance highlights the need for alternative malaria prevention strategies in pregnant women. A novel approach was proposed: screening with an ultra-sensitive rapid diagnostic test and treating positive with pyronaridine-artesunate (ISTp-uRDT-PA). This trial compared the impact of both strategies on maternal malaria and anaemia, abortion, intrauterine death, birth weight, preterm delivery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Post-treatment duration of positivity for standard and ultra-sensitive Plasmodium falciparum antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests, a cohort study from a low-endemic setting in Namibia.

EBioMedicine

January 2025

Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco 94158, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75390, USA; Department of Pediatrics, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, San Francisco 94158

Article Synopsis
  • - The study investigated how long malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) and ultra-sensitive RDT (uRDT) remained positive after treatment in a low transmission area in Namibia, finding an average positivity duration of 42 days for RDT and 67 days for uRDT.
  • - Factors such as younger age, higher initial parasite density, and persistent parasitemia were linked to longer test positivity, indicating that the usual explanations for lingering positive results, like drug resistance, did not apply.
  • - These prolonged positivity durations highlight challenges in using RDTs and uRDTs for accurately identifying current infections in low transmission settings, as they might reflect residual parasite DNA rather than active infection.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study focuses on the role of asymptomatic malaria carriers in sustaining transmission and compares the effectiveness of two different diagnostic tests (uRDT and cRDT) for detecting asymptomatic malaria in Ghana over a year.
  • Researchers tested 4,000 participants in two towns, and through mass testing and treatment initiatives, they tracked the impact on malaria prevalence.
  • Results showed that while the intervention site saw a significant decrease in asymptomatic parasite prevalence, the control site did not experience a notable change, and the models indicated the impact of diagnosis sensitivity and human movement on the effectiveness of the interventions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Low peripheral parasitaemia caused by sequestration of Plasmodium falciparum in the placenta hampers the diagnosis of malaria in pregnant women, leading to microscopy or conventional rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) false-negative results. Although mainly asymptomatic, maternal malaria remains harmful to pregnant women and their offspring in endemic settings and must be adequately diagnosed. Ultra-sensitive RDTs (uRDTs) are thought to be more sensitive than RDTs, and their diagnostic performance was assessed in the current study in pregnant women living in Kinshasa, a stable malaria transmission area in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are crucial for detecting malaria, especially in pregnancy, and a new highly sensitive rapid diagnostic test (HS-RDT) shows promise for improving diagnosis and outcomes in malaria-endemic regions.
  • A review of thirteen studies comparing HS-RDT with conventional RDT (co-RDT) and molecular methods found varying sensitivity rates for both tests, with HS-RDT generally performing better in detecting low parasite densities.
  • Despite its higher analytical sensitivity, the clinical advantages of HS-RDT over co-RDT were marginal and not statistically significant, indicating a need for further research to fully assess the benefits of RDT improvements.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF