A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Assessing Patient Preferences and Response to Extended Colonoscopy Intervals in a Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Program. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Individuals with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) are advised to have surveillance colonoscopies at guideline-recommended intervals to prevent cancer development. As more recent clinical guideline updates have extended colonoscopy intervals for those with lower risk findings, effective communication of these surveillance changes is essential for ensuring patient acceptance.

Aims: To evaluate patient preferences for surveillance colonoscopy frequency, and responses to an extended colonoscopy interval.

Methods: The study population included individuals at increased risk for CRC who were enrolled in a South Australian surveillance program. Preferences for surveillance frequency were collected via survey, and responses to a letter implementing a guideline-recommended colonoscopy interval change from 3 to 5 years were obtained from clinical data.

Results: While 46.6% (n = 186/399) of survey respondents preferred a more frequent colonoscopy interval than their current clinical recommendation, 80.4% indicated that they would be comfortable following whatever their specialist recommends. In practice, only 2.9% (n = 11/380) of patients queried the extended surveillance colonoscopy interval with the clinical team.

Conclusions: Specialist involvement can increase the acceptance of extended colonoscopy intervals, despite patient preferences for more frequent procedures. Therefore, the implementation of updated surveillance guidelines should be communicated to patients with specialist endorsement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972215PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-08925-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

extended colonoscopy
16
patient preferences
12
colonoscopy intervals
12
colonoscopy interval
12
colonoscopy
8
colorectal cancer
8
surveillance
8
surveillance program
8
individuals increased
8
increased risk
8

Similar Publications