Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Variations in image clarity across different OCT devices, along with the inconsistent delineation of RNFL boundaries, pose a challenge to achieving consistent diagnoses for glaucoma. Recently, deep learning methods such as GANs for image transformation have been gaining attention. This paper introduces deep learning methods to transform low-clarity images from one OCT device into high-clarity images from another, concurrently estimating the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) segmentation lines in the enhanced images. We applied two deep learning methods, pix2pix and cycle-GAN, and provided a comparison of their performance by evaluating the similarity between the generated and actual images, as well as comparing the generated RNFL boundary delineation with the actual boundaries. The image conversion performance was compared based on two criteria: Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) and curve dissimilarity. In the comparison of FID values, the cycle-GAN method showed significantly lower values than the pix2pix method (-value < 0.001). In terms of curve similarity, the cycle-GAN method also demonstrated higher similarity to the actual curves compared to both manually annotated curves and the pix2pix method (-value < 0.001). We demonstrated that the cycle-GAN method produces more consistent and precise outcomes in the converted images compared to the pix2pix method. The resulting segmented lines showed a high degree of similarity to those manually annotated by clinical experts in high-clarity images, surpassing the boundary accuracy observed in the original low-clarity scans.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817277 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15030277 | DOI Listing |