A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Presentation of an Auditory Training Protocol Applied in Children with Central Auditory Processing Disorder. | LitMetric

Presentation of an Auditory Training Protocol Applied in Children with Central Auditory Processing Disorder.

Codas

Departamento de Desenvolvimento Humano e Reabilitação e Centro de Investigação em Pediatria - DDHR, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas - FCM, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP - Campinas (SP), Brasil.

Published: May 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To present an auditory training protocol in children with Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD).

Methods: The study included nine children aged from 9 to 12, with five females and four males. Only children with auditory thresholds within the normal range and bilateral type A tympanometric curves were selected. Initially, a behavioral assessment of Central Auditory Processing (CAP) was conducted, and a self-perception questionnaire was administered. Subsequently, eight sessions of auditory training were conducted following a defined protocol with four specific activities per session, aimed at training distinct auditory skills. In a third phase, a new CAP behavioral assessment was carried out, and the questionnaire was reapplied.

Results: The quantitative analysis of the pre- and post-training behavioral tests showed statistically significant improvements in the Left Dichotic Digit Test (DDT), the Left Competing Dissyllable Test (SSW), the Left Synthetic Sentence Identification with Ipsilateral Competing Message Test (SSI), and the Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT). An improvement in auditory behavioral perception of the participants was also observed, as indicated by the self-perception questionnaire responses.

Conclusion: Although the auditory training protocol did not result in complete normalization in the Central Auditory Processing (CAP) Behavioral Assessment tests, an improvement in the auditory skills of binaural integration, figure-ground and temporal resolution of participants was observed, as well as in their personal perception of these abilities.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11813180PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240022ptDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

auditory training
16
central auditory
16
auditory processing
16
training protocol
12
behavioral assessment
12
auditory
11
children central
8
processing disorder
8
processing cap
8
self-perception questionnaire
8

Similar Publications