98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Heart failure (HF) hospitalization is increasing in Japan's aging population. Current guidelines recommend daily biometric monitoring for patients with HF to facilitate early clinical intervention. However, promoting patient self-management remains insufficient. Therefore, we assessed the usefulness of the LAVITA telemonitoring system, which automatically obtains and stores the biometric data of patients with HF via wireless devices.
Methods And Results: This prospective, single-arm, multicenter cohort study enrolled patients with HF. Patients were introduced to the LAVITA telemonitoring system and trained to measure body weight, blood pressure, pulse rate, oxygen saturation (SpO), physical activity with activity trackers (AT), and electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO). The primary outcome was the measurement rate of each cetology at 9-12 weeks post-discharge. The secondary outcomes included the subgroup analyses by age, sex, and left ventricular function. Thirty patients continued to use the system at home. The measurement rates of patient data were as follows: body weight 92.4% (interquartile range [IQR] 83.3-97.8%); blood pressure 95.6% (IQR 84.8-98.5%); pulse rate 96.5% (IQR 86.5-98.8%); SpO 93.1% (IQR 76.6-97.9%); AT 88.4% (IQR 31.3-98.5%); and ePRO 76.9% (IQR 26.4-95.9%). The subgroup analysis did not significantly differ.
Conclusions: The LAVITA telemonitoring system had high measurement rates for the biometric data of patients with HF, including elderly patients. Hence, it can possibly improve patient self-management and facilitate early clinical intervention.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11807691 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0099 | DOI Listing |
Circ Rep
February 2025
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences Ishikawa Japan.
Background: Heart failure (HF) hospitalization is increasing in Japan's aging population. Current guidelines recommend daily biometric monitoring for patients with HF to facilitate early clinical intervention. However, promoting patient self-management remains insufficient.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRespir Care
July 2024
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and Daedalus Enterprises, Irving, Texas.
Given the important role of patient-ventilator assessments in ensuring the safety and efficacy of mechanical ventilation, a team of respiratory therapists and a librarian used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to make the following recommendations: (1) We recommend assessment of plateau pressure to ensure lung-protective ventilator settings (strong recommendation, high certainty); (2) We recommend an assessment of tidal volume (V) to ensure lung-protective ventilation (4-8 mL/kg/predicted body weight) (strong recommendation, high certainty); (3) We recommend documenting V as mL/kg predicted body weight (strong recommendation, high certainty); (4) We recommend an assessment of PEEP and auto-PEEP (strong recommendation, high certainty); (5) We suggest assessing driving pressure to prevent ventilator-induced injury (conditional recommendation, low certainty); (6) We suggest assessing F to ensure normoxemia (conditional recommendation, very low certainty); (7) We suggest telemonitoring to supplement direct bedside assessment in settings with limited resources (conditional recommendation, low certainty); (8) We suggest direct bedside assessment rather than telemonitoring when resources are adequate (conditional recommendation, low certainty); (9) We suggest assessing adequate humidification for patients receiving noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and invasive mechanical ventilation (conditional recommendation, very low certainty); (10) We suggest assessing the appropriateness of the humidification device during NIV and invasive mechanical ventilation (conditional recommendation, low certainty); (11) We recommend that the skin surrounding artificial airways and NIV interfaces be assessed (strong recommendation, high certainty); (12) We suggest assessing the dressing used for tracheostomy tubes and NIV interfaces (conditional recommendation, low certainty); (13) We recommend assessing the pressure inside the cuff of artificial airways using a manometer (strong recommendation, high certainty); (14) We recommend that continuous cuff pressure assessment should not be implemented to decrease the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (strong recommendation, high certainty); and (15) We suggest assessing the proper placement and securement of artificial airways (conditional recommendation, very low certainty).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF