Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of reinfection in patients after two-stage revision of an infected megaprosthesis (MPR) implanted after resection of a bone tumour.

Methods: A retrospective study was carried out of 186 patients from 16 bone sarcoma centres treated between January 2010 and December 2020. The median age at the time of tumour diagnosis was 26 years (IQR 17 to 33); 69 (37.1%) patients were female, and 117 (62.9%) were male.

Results: A total of 186 patients with chronic MPR infections were included. Median follow-up was 68 months (IQR 31 to 105). The most represented sites of MPR were distal femur in 93 cases (50.0%) and proximal tibia in 53 cases (28.5%). Polymicrobial infections were seen in 34 cases (18.3%). The most frequent isolated pathogens were staphylococci. Difficult-to-treat (DTT) pathogens were isolated in 50 cases (26.9%). The estimated infection recurrence (IR) rate was 39.1% at five years and 50.0% at ten years. A higher IR rate was found in DTT PJI compared to non-DTT infections (p = 0.019). Polymicrobial infections also showed a higher rate of infection recurrence (p = 0.046).

Conclusion: This study suggests that an infected MPR treated by two-stage revision and ultimately reimplantation with a MPR can be successful, but the surgeon must be aware of a high recurrence rate compared to those seen with infected conventional implants.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0562.R2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

two-stage revision
12
186 patients
8
polymicrobial infections
8
infection recurrence
8
recurrence rate
8
higher rate
8
mpr
5
revision infection
4
infection oncological
4
oncological megaprostheses
4

Similar Publications

Background: Choosing the appropriate implants for reconstruction in revision TKA is essential for long-term fixation. While cones and augments are routinely utilized to address tibial defects, the effect of augment location and size on the biomechanical stability of revision TKA constructs and the indications for the use of metaphyseal cones are not known.

Questions/purposes: Is the risk of cement-implant debonding of revision TKA constructs impacted by the thickness and location (medial versus bicompartmental) of tibial augments and the presence of metaphyseal cones during (1) a demanding daily activity like stair ascent and (2) torsional loads?

Methods: Under institutional review board approval, we developed patient-specific finite-element models of revision TKA from four patients (three males and one female, ages 50 to 80 years, BMI 27 to 37 kg/m2) who underwent two-stage revision and had a CT scan with no metal artifact after first-stage implant removal.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Knee arthroplasty is a widely performed surgical procedure that significantly improves the quality of life for patients with advanced knee joint diseases. However, many multidisciplinary healthcare professionals lack a clear understanding of the types and subtypes of knee arthroplasty, which is essential for effective perioperative care and rehabilitation planning. This narrative review categorises knee arthroplasty into three main types: total knee arthroplasty, partial knee arthroplasty, and revision knee arthroplasty.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Two-stage revision with an antibiotic-loaded, temporary static cement spacer is a common treatment for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee. However, limited data exists on in vivo antibiotic elution kinetics after spacer implantation. This pilot study uses the technique of microdialysis (MD) to collect intra-articular knee samples.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes in patients who underwent two-stage cementless arthrodesis following multiple revision surgeries for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), after a mean follow-up of 57.0 months (range, two to 208).

Methods: From 2002 to 2012, 31 patients underwent a two-stage revision for PJI using an intramedullary modular arthrodesis system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Nasolabial Flap Variations and Alternatives in Nasal Ala Reconstruction.

Plast Reconstr Surg

August 2025

AARE KLINIK, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Bern, Switzerland.

Background: Different nasolabial flap variations have been advocated, including two-staged and single-staged flaps. However, when to choose which variation remains unclear. The performance of nasolabial flap variations was analyzed and compared to other reconstructive options.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF