Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Observations from the NASA Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) provide global information on forest structure and biomass. Footprint-level predictions of aboveground biomass density (AGBD) in the GEDI mission are based on training data sourced from sparsely distributed field plots coincident with airborne laser scanning surveys. National Forest Inventories (NFI) are rarely used to calibrate GEDI footprint biomass models because their sampling and positional accuracy prevent accurate colocation with GEDI or ALS. This omission can limit the harmonization of jurisdictional biomass estimates from NFI's and GEDI; however, there are methods available to improve the colocation of NFI plots with GEDI footprints. Focusing on Mediterranean forests in Spain, we compared different approaches to the collocation of NFI and GEDI data: (i) simulated waveforms from ALS; (ii) nearest-neighbor on-orbit GEDI waveforms; and (iii) imputed GEDI waveforms imputed to NFI plot locations using a novel geostatistical method. These methods are potential solutions to improve the local performance of biomass models and address potential local systematic deviations between GEDI and NFI estimates. We assess the advantages and limitations of these methods to locally calibrate GEDI biomass models and quantify the impact of geolocation errors in reference NFI plot data. The new biomass models from each method were used to predict footprint level AGBD, which were then gridded for a province in the North-West of Spain. It was found that the imputation approach is not sensitive to common errors in NFI plot geolocation, but it can outperform ALS-based simulation in some cases, highlighting the benefit of information from multiple GEDI footprints proximate to NFI plots for improving biomass predictions. This research provides users with benchmark of available techniques to locally-calibrate GEDI footprint biomass models.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124313 | DOI Listing |