A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Cluster analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis using preoperative alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin levels: a multi-institutional study. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide and is characterized by high recurrence rates after curative resection. The tumor markers des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) are crucial for HCC diagnosis and prognosis. However, their roles in the modern era of HCC epidemiology require reevaluation.

Methods: This multi-institutional retrospective study analyzed 1515 patients who underwent hepatectomy for primary HCC. Patients were classified into 4 clusters using k-means analysis based on preoperative DCP and AFP levels. Clinicopathologic characteristics, overall survival (OS), and recurrence rate (RR) were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) comparisons.

Results: Cluster 3 (concurrent elevations of DCP and AFP) had the poorest 5-year OS (52.8%) and the highest RR (79.3%), whereas cluster 4 (low levels of both markers) had the most favorable outcomes, with a 5-year OS rate of 71.5% and an RR of 55.7%. Cluster 1 (elevated DCP alone) was associated with larger tumors (median of 45 mm) and more frequent vascular invasion (43%) than cluster 2 (elevated AFP alone, median tumor size of 24 mm, and vascular invasion of 36%). DCP was a stronger predictor of 5-year OS in patients with preserved liver function (AUROC, 0.63), whereas AFP was more effective in stratifying RR in patients with impaired liver function (AUROC, 0.57). Non-B, non-C hepatitis (NBNC)-related HCC exhibited a distinct biomarker profile, with an elevated DCP level correlating with a higher 5-year RR (67%) than other etiologies.

Conclusion: Our study introduces tumor marker clustering as a novel analytical approach, providing a nuanced understanding of AFP and DCP's combined utility in predicting prognosis and recurrence. Our findings highlight the independent and complementary roles of these biomarkers, particularly in NBNC-related HCC and in cases with impaired liver function. AFP and DCP remain crucial tools for recurrence risk assessment, guiding personalized management strategies, such as surveillance, neoadjuvant therapies, and tailored postoperative interventions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2025.101980DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

liver function
12
hepatocellular carcinoma
8
des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin
8
dcp afp
8
cluster elevated
8
elevated dcp
8
vascular invasion
8
function auroc
8
impaired liver
8
nbnc-related hcc
8

Similar Publications