Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Nasal high flow (NHF) therapy is an established form of non invasive respiratory support used in acute and chronic care. Recently, a new high flow nasal cannula with asymmetric prongs was approved for clinical use. The clinical benefits of the new cannula have not yet been defined and no evidence are available on the use of asymmetric NHF support in patient with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). We conducted a single-centre, prospective, physiologic, crossover, randomised study to investigate the effects on partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO) levels of two different nasal cannula ("asymmetric" vs "standard" nasal interface) in 20 COPD hypercapnic patients. All patients were recovering from an acute exacerbation that required hospitalisation and had persistent hypercapnia, despite having attained a stable pH. After enrolment, two 90-min trials with the asymmetric nasal high flow interface (Optiflow + Duet, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd., New Zealand) or the standard interface (Optiflow, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd., New Zealand) were randomly applied and a washout period of 60 min between the two treatments was performed for minimising the carryover effect. Study results suggested that the asymmetrical cannula did not significantly decrease PaCO compared with the standard cannula. Similar performances were also observed in terms of diaphragm activity, dyspnoea and patient's comfort. Interestingly, asymmetric NHF cannula performed significantly better in reducing the dead space ventilation and increasing the ventilatory efficiency in more advanced COPD patients with more severe hypercapnia higher baseline PaCO values (PaCO ≥ 65 mmHg at baseline). .
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25310429.2024.2411813 | DOI Listing |