98%
921
2 minutes
20
Face masks can impact processing a narrative in sign language, affecting several metacognitive dimensions of understanding (i.e., perceived effort, confidence and feeling of understanding). However, to what extent this is modulated by sign language proficiency remains an open question. Thirty deaf adults were administered a narrative in Italian Sign Language (LIS), signed in three different visual conditions: no mask, transparent mask, opaque mask. In addition, they completed a Sentence Reproduction Task in LIS (LIS-SRT) to measure their sign language proficiency. Results showed that some of the error types in the LIS-SRT have significant correlations with performance in the comprehension task, revealing external validity for this sentence repetition test. Crucially, while sign language proficiency did not modulate the impact of face-masks on narrative comprehension, the metacognitive outcomes were clearly influenced by the interaction between LIS proficiency and visual conditions. Skilled signers experienced less effort and higher levels of confidence and feeling of understanding, whereas these subjective experiences were greatly impacted by visual conditions in less proficient signers. We discuss these findings in reference to cognitive load, thus also extending the construct of "listening effort" to sign languages. In addition, we relate differences in cognitive load in skilled vs. less proficient signers to the ability to extract and process at the same time multiple types of linguistic elements from the flow of signs (multilinear processing of sign language).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10339-024-01254-5 | DOI Listing |
Front Artif Intell
August 2025
School of Computation and Communication Science and Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania.
Computer vision has been identified as one of the solutions to bridge communication barriers between speech-impaired populations and those without impairment as most people are unaware of the sign language used by speech-impaired individuals. Numerous studies have been conducted to address this challenge. However, recognizing word signs, which are usually dynamic and involve more than one frame per sign, remains a challenge.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJMIR Res Protoc
September 2025
Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Background: Cancer screening nonadherence persists among adults who are deaf, deafblind, and hard of hearing (DDBHH). These barriers span individual, clinician, and health care system levels, contributing to difficulties understanding cancer information, accessing screening services, and following treatment directives. Critical communication barriers include ineffective patient-physician communication, limited access to American Sign Language (ASL) cancer information, misconceptions about medical procedures, insurance navigation difficulties, and intersectional barriers for multiply marginalized individuals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLOS Glob Public Health
September 2025
DataDrive2030, Cape Town, South Africa.
Early Childhood Development is a key national priority in South Africa which has developed the Early Learning Outcome Measure (ELOM 4&5) specifically designed to measure the progress of 4- and 5-year-old children across 5 domains of early childhood development. This age-validated, population-standardised instrument has been shown to have measurement equivalence and lack of bias across South Africa's 11 official spoken languages. In 2023, South African Sign Language was formally recognised as 12th official language of South Africa, but no ELOM (4&5) exists in SASL despite over 6,000 deaf children being born annually.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Open
September 2025
Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
Objectives: There are more than 10 million deaf or hard of hearing people in the UK. While the deaf and hard of hearing population is heterogeneous, many of those with profound hearing loss are part of deaf communities (UK estimate around 120 000) which are defined minority communities. Many members of deaf communities are sign language users.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF