A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Association between frailty and specific comorbidities on oncological outcomes in metastatic hormone-sensitive and castration resistant prostate cancer. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: Demographic changes will lead to higher proportions of metastatic hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) and castration resistant metastatic prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with higher frailty index and multiple comorbidities.

Materials And Methods: We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to explore the effect of frailty (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG]), as well as cardiovascular (CVD) and secondary malignancy (SecCa) comorbidities on overall survival (OS) and time to mCRPC in mHSPC and OS in mCRPC patients with Kaplan-Meyer estimates and Cox regression models.

Results: Of 802 mHSPC patients, 61% were ECOG0 vs. 32% ECOG1 vs. 6.5% ECOG≥2. Significant differences in baseline patient and baseline mHSPC characteristics were observed for all three groups (all P ≤ 0.05). In time to mCRPC analyses and OS analyses of mHSPC and mCRPC patients, significant disadvantages were observed for ECOG 1/≥2 patients, relative to ECOG0, even after multivariable adjustment. Moreover, 31% of included patients had history/active CVD, which yielded significant median OS differences in mHSPC patients (95 vs. 63 months, multivariable hazard ratio: HR: 1.77, P < 0.01), but not in mCRPC patients (P = 0.085). After stratification according to SecCa, 14% had a SecCa which led to significant median OS differences in mCRPC patients (50 vs. 37 months, P < 0.01) but not in mHSPC patients (76 vs. 64 months, P = 0.089). Patients with higher frailty index and comorbidities showed significant differences in therapy lines.

Conclusion: Frailty and specific comorbidities significantly influence cancer-control outcomes in mHSPC, as well as mCRPC patients, even after controlling for adverse tumor characteristics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.01.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mcrpc patients
24
patients
12
mhspc patients
12
patients months
12
frailty specific
8
specific comorbidities
8
metastatic hormone-sensitive
8
castration resistant
8
prostate cancer
8
mhspc
8

Similar Publications