A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Is There a Difference Between Seropositive and Seronegative Sjögren Disease Dry Eye? | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: The study aims to compare dry eye disease (DED) prevalence and severity between seropositive and seronegative Sjögren disease (SjD).

Methods: Prospective, consecutive, comparative cross-sectional cohort study. A total of 160 eyes of 80 patients with SjD by The American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism 2016 criteria were included: 55 seropositive and 25 seronegative SjD. Associated SjD was excluded. Patients had dry eye tests performed. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for intereye correlation of the same participant.

Results: Mean age was 52.2 ± 12.7, 96.3% were women, no differences were observed between groups (P > 0.05). Seronegative SjD had positive minor salivary gland biopsy more often (100% vs. 82%, P = 0.024), but with lower focus score (2.0 ± 1.2 vs. 4.1 ± 3.5, P = 0.006) than seropositive SjD group. DED prevalence was similar in seropositive and seronegative SjD (92.7% and 84%; P = 0.088). Only noninvasive break-up time (NIBUT) average was significantly reduced in seropositive SjD (6.6 ± 3.2 vs. 8.8 ± 2.4, P = 0.011), and the rest of the evaluated DED tests were not significant. In the seropositive group, nonstatistically significant trends toward more severe DED signs, including matrix metalloproteinase-9, osmolarity, Schirmer I without anesthesia, fluorescein tear break-up time, NIBUT first, and Sicca Ocular Staining Score, were observed. Both groups were highly symptomatic in ocular surface disease index score (43 ± 23 vs. 46 ± 30, P = 0.779) and had a reduction in quality of life in National Eye Institute visual health questionnaire-25 test (72 ± 21 vs. 70 ± 24, P = 0.650).

Conclusions: Patients with seropositive SjD showed significantly reduced NIBUT and a trend of more severe DED signs. Patients with seronegative and seropositive SjD were similarly highly symptomatic, experienced important reductions in vision-related quality of life, and had similar DED prevalence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003814DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

seropositive seronegative
16
seropositive sjd
16
ded prevalence
12
seronegative sjd
12
sjd
9
seronegative sjögren
8
sjögren disease
8
dry eye
8
seropositive
8
observed groups
8

Similar Publications