A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

A retrospective multicenter study on the efficacy and safety of disitamab vedotin monotherapy versus combination with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Novel therapeutic agents including disitamab vedotin (RC48, an antibody-drug conjugate) and immune-checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., PD-1 inhibitors) have provided new hope as an advanced gastric-cancer (GC) treatment. This multicenter retrospective study studied RC48 monotherapy (MT)'s efficacy and safety against its combination with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy (IT) in advanced GC. Patients treated with RC48 MT or RC48 combined with anti-PD-1 IT from July 2021 to April 2023 were recruited for the study. The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective-response rate (ORR), disease-control rate (DCR), and safety were studied. After propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1), this study included 34 in the RC48 plus anti-PD-1 IT group and 34 in the RC48 MT group. The median PFS was significantly longer in the combination-therapy (CT) group than in the MT group (5.3 versus 3.8 months, HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31-0.85, p = 0.010), and the median OS was also notably increased (10.0 versus 6.8 months, HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.27-0.77, p = 0.003). The ORR and DCR were higher in the combination group (41.18% versus 14.71%, p = 0.031; 61.76% versus 35.30%, p = 0.052). Moreover, subgroup analyses further revealed that those in the CT group experienced a longer PFS and OS, particularly those with high HER2 expression or a PD-L1 CPS score of 1 or higher. The combination therapy (CT) achieved acceptable tolerability and manageable adverse events. Furthermore, the most common grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included decreased white-blood-cell (WBC) count, decreased neutrophil count, and anemia. No new safety risks were observed. In sum, the RC48 and anti-PD-1 IT combination showed good efficacy and a manageable safety profile, indicating its strong potential as an advanced GC therapeutic option.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742410PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86504-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

efficacy safety
8
disitamab vedotin
8
combination anti-pd-1
8
anti-pd-1 immunotherapy
8
immunotherapy advanced
8
rc48 anti-pd-1
8
versus months
8
higher combination
8
adverse events
8
rc48
7

Similar Publications