A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Strategies for Poststroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Strategies for Poststroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil

Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Institute of Clinical Neurology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Clinical Research Center for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Neurological Diseases of Fujian Province, Fuzhou, Chi

Published: August 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising approach in improving swallowing function after stroke. However, comparative efficacy of different rTMS protocols for poststroke dysphagia (PSD) remains unclear.

Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane database were systematically searched for eligible random controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to August 30, 2024.

Study Selection: RCTs comparing rTMS with control or head-to-head comparisons of 2 rTMS protocols in patients with PSD.

Data Extraction: Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers. A network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect evidence was conducted to assess the pooled findings of RCTs with standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% credible interval (CrI).

Data Synthesis: Eighteen RCTs involving 760 participants (mean age of 62.4 [range 49.7-74.7] years; 45.7% women) were included. Pooled data showed that high frequency (HF)/ipsilesional hemisphere (ipsi-hemi) (SMD, -0.94; 95% CrI, -1.51 to -0.44), HF/bilateral hemisphere (bi-hemi) (SMD, -2.59; 95% CrI, -3.50 to -1.72), HF/ipsilesional cerebellar (ipsi-CRB) (SMD, -0.79; 95% CrI, -1.55 to -0.10), HF/bilateral cerebellar (bi-CRB) (SMD, -1.02; 95% CrI, -1.83 to -0.29), and HF/ipsi-hemi + low frequency (LF)/contralesional hemisphere (contra-hemi) (SMD, -2.72; 95% CrI, -4.12 to -1.41) rTMS all significantly improved swallowing function compared with control. For patients with acute stroke, HF/ipsi-hemi rTMS had a positive effect (SMD, -1.36; 95% CrI, -2.86 to -0.02); in subacute stage, HF/ipsi-hemi + LF/contra-hemi rTMS showed the best efficacy (SMD, -2.68; 95% CrI, -4.26 to -1.26). However, rTMS failed to improve swallowing function in chronic stage.

Conclusions: This network meta-analysis showed that most of the rTMS protocols (HF/ipsi-hemi, HF/bi-hemi, HF/ipsi-CRB, HF/bi-CRB, and HF/ipsi-hemi + LF/contra-hemi) may improve swallowing function in patients with PSD. The HF/ipsi-hemi rTMS had a positive effect in acute stage and the HF/ipsi-hemi + LF/contra-hemi protocol seemed to have the best efficacy when applied in subacute stroke.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.12.018DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

95% cri
28
swallowing function
16
network meta-analysis
12
rtms protocols
12
hf/ipsi-hemi lf/contra-hemi
12
rtms
10
repetitive transcranial
8
transcranial magnetic
8
magnetic stimulation
8
poststroke dysphagia
8

Similar Publications