Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
The effective reproduction number serves as a metric of population-wide, time-varying disease spread. During the early years of the COVID-19 pandemic, this metric was primarily derived from case data, which has varied in quality and representativeness due to changes in testing volume, test-seeking behavior, and resource constraints. Deriving nowcasting estimates from alternative data sources such as wastewater provides complementary information that could inform future public health responses. We estimated county-aggregated, sewershed-restricted wastewater-based SARS-CoV-2 effective reproduction numbers from May 1, 2022 to April 30, 2023 for five counties in California with heterogeneous population sizes, clinical testing rates, demographics, wastewater coverage, and sampling frequencies. We used two methods to produce sewershed-restricted effective reproduction numbers, both based on smoothed and deconvolved wastewater concentrations. We then population-weighted and aggregated these sewershed-level estimates to arrive at county-level effective reproduction numbers. Using mean absolute error (MAE), Spearman's rank correlation (ρ), confusion matrix classification, and cross-correlation analyses, we compared the timing and trajectory of our two wastewater-based models to: (1) a publicly available, county-level ensemble of case-based estimates, and (2) county-aggregated, sewershed-restricted case-based estimates. Both wastewater models demonstrated high concordance with the traditional case-based estimates, as indicated by low mean absolute errors (MAE ≤ 0.09), significant positive Spearman correlation (ρ ≥ 0.66), and high confusion matrix classification accuracy (≥ 0.81). The relative timings of wastewater- and case-based estimates were less clear, with cross-correlation analyses suggesting strong associations for a wide range of temporal lags that varied by county and wastewater model type. This methodology provides a generalizable, robust, and operationalizable framework for estimating county-level wastewater-based effective reproduction numbers. Our retrospective evaluation supports the potential usage of real-time wastewater-based nowcasting as a complementary epidemiological tool for surveillance by public health agencies at the state and local levels. Based on this research, we produced publicly available wastewater-based nowcasts for the California Communicable diseases Assessment Tool (calcat.cdph.ca.gov).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100803 | DOI Listing |