Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objectives: The use of plasma uracil measurements to detect dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is one of the methods for preventing toxicities associated with fluoropyrimidines, including 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU). Unfortunately, this measurement is subject to variations, that may lead to unnecessary dosage reductions and therefore to a reduced efficacy of treatment. Recently, new factors such as hepatic and renal impairment have been proposed as also influencing uracil concentration. The aim of our study was therefore to study the influence of renal or hepatic function on 5-FU clearance.
Patients And Methods: This was a retrospective study, using patients treated with 5-FU between September 1, 2018 to December 1, 2022 in a French Clinical Cancer Center. Patients were included after treatment with 5FU and therapeutic monitoring of 5FU concentrations after each course of chemotherapy. For each patient, DPD phenotyping by uracil concentration measurement was determined before the first course of 5FU. Blood samples were then taken the day after the start of the 5-FU infusion, between 8 and 10 am, for the first three cycles of 5-FU. With the exception of uracil concentration, which was determined only once, the various data were recorded for each course of 5FU chemotherapy performed. Patients with incomplete information (missing one of the above parameters) were excluded from the database.
Results: We included 227 patients, corresponding to 227 uracil concentrations and 575 5-FU concentrations. In an original development, our results show for the first time that 5-FU clearance was proportionally correlated with eGFR (calculated according to CKD-EPI formula). Although we failed to demonstrate this hypothesis significantly, we observed that 5-FU clearance may be more dependent on eGFR than on uracil concentration for low uracil concentrations values.
Conclusion: Our study reinforces the still poorly accepted idea of the value of focusing on eGFR in 5-FU dose adjustment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-024-04732-x | DOI Listing |