98%
921
2 minutes
20
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164369.].
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658513 | PMC |
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316419 | PLOS |
Chest
September 2025
Division of Pulmonology, Geneva University Hospitals, Hôpital de La Tour, Meyrin, Geneva, and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address:
Background: Nocturnal SpO monitoring is recommended for detecting residual sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), including nocturnal hypoventilation, in patients treated by non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). It is a general assumption that different pulse oximetry devices will provide similar results. This may, however, not be correct.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Cataract Refract Surg
July 2025
Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Topic: The aim of this study was to assess the meta-analysis of the studies comparing transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) to classical photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) (mechanical or alcohol-assisted).
Clinical Relevance: While PRK is a well-established procedure, TransPRK, a newer, minimally invasive technique may reduce surgery time and improve patient outcomes. Comparing these techniques helps optimize surgical choices.
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRev Cardiovasc Med
August 2025
E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Institute of Cardiovascular Pathology Research, 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Background: Presently, the availability of single-stage surgical correction of mitral valve disease combined with atrial fibrillation (AF) via a mini-access approach remains limited. Moreover, the comparative effectiveness of this procedure versus conventional sternotomy (CS) remains poorly understood. Thus, this study aimed to conduct a comparative assessment of the efficacy and safety of concomitant mitral valve surgery and AF ablation via a minimally invasive approach (minimally invasive cardiac surgery, MICS group) versus the standard sternotomy approach (CS group).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF