A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Safety and Efficacy of Two Ultrathin Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Real-World Practice: Genoss DES Stents Versus Orsiro Stents From a Prospective Registry. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The Orsiro and Genoss DES stents are biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents (DESs) with ultrathin struts.

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of these two ultrathin DESs in real-world practice.

Methods: From a single-center prospective registry, we included 751 and 931 patients treated with the Genoss DES and Orsiro stents, respectively. After propensity score matching, we compared 483 patients in each group with respect to a device-oriented composite outcome (DOCO), which comprised cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization up to 2 follow-up years.

Results: After propensity score matching, there were no significant between-group differences in clinical and angiographic characteristics. During the median follow-up period of 730 days (interquartile range, 427-730 days), there was no significant between-group difference in the DOCO rate (3.1% in the Genoss DES group vs. 2.9% in the Orsiro group, log-rank p = 0.847).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy between the Orsiro and Genoss DES stents during a 2-year follow-up period in real-world practice. However, this result should be confirmed in a large randomized controlled trial.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02038127.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652947PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.70060DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

genoss des
20
safety efficacy
12
des stents
12
efficacy ultrathin
8
biodegradable polymer
8
real-world practice
8
orsiro stents
8
prospective registry
8
orsiro genoss
8
propensity score
8

Similar Publications