98%
921
2 minutes
20
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming medical radiation applications by handling complex data, learning patterns, and making accurate predictions, leading to improved patient outcomes. This article examines the use of AI in optimising radiation doses for x-ray imaging, improving radiotherapy outcomes, and briefly addresses the benefits, challenges, and limitations of AI integration into clinical workflows. In diagnostic radiology, AI plays a pivotal role in optimising radiation exposure, reducing noise, enhancing image contrast, and lowering radiation doses, especially in high-dose procedures like computed tomography (CT). Deep learning (DL)-powered CT reconstruction methods have already been incorporated into clinical routine. Moreover, AI-powered methodologies have been developed to provide real-time, patient-specific radiation dose estimates. These AI-driven tools have the potential to streamline workflows and potentially become integral parts of imaging practices. In radiotherapy, AI's ability to automate and enhance the precision of treatment planning is emphasised. Traditional methods, such as manual contouring, are time-consuming and prone to variability. AI-driven techniques, particularly DL models, are automating the segmentation of organs and tumours, improving the accuracy of radiation delivery, and minimising damage to healthy tissues. Moreover, AI supports adaptive radiotherapy, allowing continuous optimisation of treatment plans based on changes in a patient's anatomy over time, ensuring the highest accuracy in radiation delivery and better therapeutic outcomes. Some of these methods have been validated and integrated into radiation treatment systems, while others are not yet ready for routine clinical use mainly due to challenges in validation, particularly ensuring reliability across diverse patient populations and clinical settings. Despite the potential of AI, there are challenges in fully integrating these technologies into clinical practice. Issues such as data protection, privacy, data quality, model validation, and the need for large and diverse datasets are crucial to ensuring the reliability of AI systems.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ad9f71 | DOI Listing |
Indian J Nucl Med
August 2025
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Objectives: Bone scintigraphy is a sensitive imaging method to evaluate patients with suspected osteonecrosis. We assessed the diagnostic performance of combined bone single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) (CBS) in patients with known rheumatic disease or other connective tissue disorders and clinical suspicion of osteonecrosis compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Methods: This prospective diagnostic accuracy study included 70 patients with clinical suspicion of osteonecrosis in any bone who underwent a planar triple-phase bone scan along with a regional SPECT/CT (CBS) and regional MRI.
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)
June 2025
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Santa Casa de São Paulo - Pavilhão Fernandinho Simonsen, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of computed tomography (CT) on the preoperative planning of posterior malleolus (PM) fractures of the ankle, comparing its information with that of conventional radiographs and assessing its impact on surgical treatment.
Methods: The study included 81 patients with PM fractures, whose radiological and CT images were analyzed by 33 specialized orthopedic surgeons. The study had two stages, with a radiological assessment on the first, and the second having radiological plus CT evaluation.
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)
June 2025
Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia Jamil Haddad, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Objective: The present study aimed to compare the accuracy of the Paprosky Classification of Femoral Bone Loss using plain radiographs and two-dimensional computed tomography (2D CT) images with the femoral defect observed intraoperatively by the surgeon.
Methods: There were 14 hip surgeons from the same hospital who classified 80 patients with an indication for revision hip arthroplasty according to Paprosky based on plain radiographs in anteroposterior views of the pelvis and 2D CT images, reconstructed in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. We compared this data with the intraoperative findings of femoral bone loss by the same surgeons.
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)
June 2025
Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia Jamil Haddad, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Objective: The present study aimed to compare the accuracy of the Paprosky Classification of Femoral Bone Loss using plain radiographs and two-dimensional computed tomography (2D CT) images with the femoral defect observed intraoperatively by the surgeon.
Methods: There were 14 hip surgeons from the same hospital who classified 80 patients with an indication for revision hip arthroplasty according to Paprosky based on plain radiographs in anteroposterior views of the pelvis and 2D CT images, reconstructed in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. We compared this data with the intraoperative findings of femoral bone loss by the same surgeons.
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)
June 2025
Grupo do Quadril, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Injuries to the proximal hamstring muscle complex are common in athletes and range from strains to tendinous and bony avulsions. The lesion mechanism typically involves an eccentric contraction of the hamstring muscles during abrupt hip hyperflexion with the knee in extension. Low-speed injuries occur in high kicks and splits, whereas tendon avulsions are common in high-speed activities, such as running and ballet.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF