Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: To estimate inter-center variation (ICV) in hospital length of stay (LOS) and oral feeding at discharge among infants with gastroschisis.
Study Design: The Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium's (CHNC) database was used to identify hospitalized survivors with gastroschisis. Two outcomes were evaluated: LOS and discharge without tube feedings. Hospital outcomes were evaluated in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Generalized linear models with log link for gamma distribution were used to model LOS and logistic regression for discharge without tube feeds.
Results: For 3987 surviving infants with gastroschisis, LOS and discharge within 70 days with exclusively oral feeding both exhibited significant ICV. Differences persisted in multivariable analyses. Risk-adjusted LOS (68% difference) and oral feeding at discharge (6.4-fold difference) varied significantly between centers.
Conclusion: Hospital of care was independently associated with LOS and exclusive oral feeding at discharge rates for infants with gastroschisis. Management differences, potentially influenced by parental preferences, contributed to variation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02160-6 | DOI Listing |