98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: 1L PBC has historically been recommended for patients with la/mUC. Maintenance avelumab is recommended for patients without disease progression following 1L PBC. Real-world data on the proportion of patients eligible for maintenance avelumab are limited, and outcomes among patients ineligible for maintenance avelumab are uncertain. This study assessed the proportion of patients with la/mUC initiating 1L PBC who were maintenance-avelumab eligible and real-world outcomes following 1L PBC by maintenance-avelumab eligibility.
Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted using a longitudinal electronic health record-derived database comprising de-identified patient-level structured and unstructured data including adults with Ia/mUC who received ≥1 dose of 1L PBC (April 2020-January 2022). The proportion of patients eligible for maintenance avelumab (real-world stable disease, partial response, or complete response following 1L PBC) was estimated and median overall survival (mOS) assessed for maintenance avelumab-eligible and -ineligible patients.
Results: Of 336 patients with Ia/mUC treated with 1L PBC (55.4% received cisplatin-based treatment 44.6% carboplatin-based treatment); 181 (54%) were maintenance-avelumab eligible; and 138 (41%) maintenance-avelumab ineligible (17 [5%] were nonevaluable). Of 181 maintenance-avelumab-eligible patients, 67 (37.0%; 19.9% of all 1L PBC-treated patients) received maintenance avelumab. mOS (95% CI) among all 1L PBC-treated patients was 15.0 (12.2-19.6) months and among maintenance-avelumab-ineligible patients was 8.0 (6.7-10.3) months; whereas among maintenance-avelumab-eligible patients (including 37% who received maintenance avelumab), mOS was 27.6 (23.4-not reached) months.
Conclusions: In this study, approximately half of 1L PBC-treated patients were maintenance-avelumab eligible, and one-fifth received it. Real-world OS remains short for the overall 1L PBC-treated population. These results support the use of treatment-guideline preferred 1L treatment options that demonstrate survival benefit for all patients with la/mUC, and are available to patients irrespective of their eligibility for cisplatin, or response to PBC.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102270 | DOI Listing |
Int J Clin Oncol
September 2025
Department of Urology, University of Tsukuba Institute of Medicine, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.
Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) remains a disease with poor prognosis. While conventional platinum-based chemotherapy has long served as the standard first-line treatment, its survival benefit is limited, particularly in cisplatin-ineligible patients. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates as part of sequential treatment has improved outcomes, with pembrolizumab, avelumab, and enfortumab vedotin (EV) providing survival benefit in later lines.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIJU Case Rep
September 2025
Department of Urology Toyama University Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.
Introduction: The association between the risk of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) reactivation and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration has been reported.
Case Presentation: A man in his seventies underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Three years postoperatively, CT revealed metastases to the para-aortic lymph nodes and rectum.
Investig Clin Urol
September 2025
Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Urothelial carcinoma, the most common malignancy of the urinary tract, presents a significant challenge, particularly in its metastatic stage, where prognosis remains poor despite advancements in treatment. Historically, platinum-based chemotherapy has been the standard first-line therapy, achieving moderate response rates but limited long-term survival. Recent breakthroughs have introduced immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and targeted therapies as more effective alternatives.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBJU Int
August 2025
Bureau for Cancer Research - Moscow office, Moscow, Russia.
Eur J Cancer
July 2025
Fourth Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Trials Unit, Henry Dunant Hospital Center Athens, Greece.
Background: Extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has poor prognosis, and first-line chemo-immunotherapy is now the standard-of-care. We hypothesized that intercalated immunotherapy administration in-between chemotherapy cycles, at maximal neoantigen release, might enhance immune response and efficacy.
Methods: PAVE is a multicenter phase II study.