A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Risk factors of positive lymph node metastasis after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and construction of prediction models. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Positive lymph node metastasis after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer is a key factor affecting the prognosis of patients, and its mechanism is complex and multifactorial. The aim of this study is to identify the relevant risk factors for positive lymph node metastasis after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, and to construct corresponding predictive models. Through a retrospective analysis of clinical data of 316 gastric cancer patients who underwent radical surgery for gastric cancer, we found that age, maximum tumor diameter, degree of tumor differentiation, vascular invasion, depth of tumor infiltration, and CA199 were important factors affecting lymph node metastasis positivity in gastric cancer patients. Based on these factors, we constructed a Nomogram prediction model and found through internal validation that the model has good predictive performance. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the training and validation sets were 0.929 and 0.888, respectively. Clinical data of another 390 patients were collected for external verification. External validation results showed that the model had a predictive sensitivity of 75.76% (50/66), a specificity of 91.05% (295/324), and an accuracy of 88.46% (345/390). In addition, we also constructed a neural network prediction model and compared it with the Nomogram model. The results showed that the prediction performance of the Nomogram model was similar to that of the neural network model. The Nomogram model has been validated internally and externally, demonstrating high discrimination and accuracy, providing a convenient, intuitive, and personalized evaluation tool for clinicians, helping to optimize the postoperative management of gastric cancer patients and improve prognosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626280PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.62347/PEDV7297DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gastric cancer
28
lymph node
16
node metastasis
16
positive lymph
12
metastasis radical
12
radical gastrectomy
12
gastrectomy gastric
12
cancer patients
12
nomogram model
12
risk factors
8

Similar Publications